Onn 8.1" Tablet (2026) vs Amazon Fire HD 10
48
out of 100
VS
41
out of 100
Here we compared two budget tablets: the 8.1-inch Onn 8.1" Tablet (2026) (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) that was released on May 18, 2026, against the Amazon Fire HD 10, which is powered by MediaTek octa-core processor and came out 1 year and 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Onn 8.1" Tablet (2026)
- Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
- Has 2x more RAM: 6GB versus 3GB
- Much smaller footprint: 35% more compact case (40.6 vs 62.8 square inches)
- 2.1x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 467 and 225 points
- Weighs 148.6 grams less
Reasons to consider the Amazon Fire HD 10
- Has a 2 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 1500 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- The front-facing camera can record video at 1080p
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1000 x 1524 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 225 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 350 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.7% | 73% |
Screen space comparison
Fire HD 10
10.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 45.8 in2
8.1" Tablet (2026)
8.1″ (3:2 ratio) = 30.3 in2
~51% more screen space
Design and build
| Height | 206 mm (8.11 inches) | 246 mm (9.69 inches) |
| Width | 127 mm (5 inches) | 164.8 mm (6.49 inches) |
| Thickness | 10 mm (0.39 inches) | 8.6 mm (0.34 inches) |
| Weight | 285 g (10.05 oz) | 433.6 g (15.29 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Plastic |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | Silver, Blue, Pink, Brown | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 262 cm2 (40.6 inches2) | 405 cm2 (62.9 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (143rd and 159th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (114th and 128th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | MediaTek octa-core processor |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | - |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) |
- |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | - |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | - |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | - |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | - |
| GPU shading units | 128 | - |
| GPU clock | 1114 MHz | - |
| FLOPS | ~285.2 GFLOPS | - |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1585 | - |
| Single-core score | 467 | 225 |
| Multi-core score | 1515 | 852 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 188324 | - |
| GPU | 27127 | - |
| Memory | 146860 | - |
| UX | 101848 | - |
| Total score | 464159 | - |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 6 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android |
| ROM | - | Fire OS |
| OS size | - | 9.7 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max charge power | - | 15 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | No | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 5 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 5 MP |
1) Standard: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 2 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | - | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | - |
| Hybrid slot | No | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | Yes |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | May 2026 | October 2024 |
| Release date | May 2026 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $138 | $139 |
| Sensors | - Ambient light sensor | - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 15 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Onn 8.1" Tablet (2026) is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1