Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus) vs Lenovo Idea Tab

50 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
VS
53 out of 100
Lenovo Idea Tab

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus) (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 695) that was released on October 5, 2023, against the Lenovo Idea Tab, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 6300 and came out 1 year and 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
  • Delivers 17% higher peak brightness (457 against 391 nits)
  • 15% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 908 and 793 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Idea Tab
  • Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
  • More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 13

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus) and Lenovo Idea Tab crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 64 GB
VS
4 / 128 GB
108.5
(Excellent)
Value Index
95.1
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type TFT LCD IPS LCD
Size 11 inches 11 inches
Resolution 1200 x 1920 pixels 2560 x 1600 pixels
Aspect ratio 8:5 16:10
PPI 206 ppi -
Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max rated brightness 500 nits 500 nits
HDR support No No
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 80.9% 82.9%
Display features - - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 94.2% 96.5%
PWM Not detected Not detected
Response time 42 ms 28 ms
Contrast 1409:1 1054:1
Peak brightness test (auto)
457 nits
391 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 257.1 mm (10.12 inches) 254.59 mm (10.02 inches)
Width 168.7 mm (6.64 inches) 166.15 mm (6.54 inches)
Thickness 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) 6.99 mm (0.28 inches)
Weight 480 g (16.93 oz) 480 g (16.93 oz)
Waterproof No IP52
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray, Blue Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 434 cm2 (67.2 inches2) 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2)
Repairability Average (2.81/5) Excellent (4.04/5)
Drop resistance - Bad (E) Β· 9 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (125th and 117th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (97th and 90th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus) and Lenovo Idea Tab
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Max clock 2200 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A76
L3 cache - 2 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP2
GPU shading units 256 64
GPU clock 840 MHz 1072 MHz
FLOPS ~430.1 GFLOPS ~137.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus) and Lenovo Idea Tab
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 1405 1249
Single-core score 908 793
Multi-core score 2072 2048
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
562445
CPU 245267 221705
GPU 57538 41398
Memory 108723 118084
UX 170923 181258
Total score 582451 562445
Samples [14 tests] Less than 3
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10572 -
Video editing 4298 -
Photo editing 22564 -
Data manipulation 8881 -
Writing score 13360 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)AnTuTu582451
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-26 (Abolfazl)AnTuTu601154
Lenovo Idea Tab
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-11 (biszkopt875)AnTuTu562445

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 64 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB Up to 2048 GB

Software

Operating system Android 13 Android 15
ROM One UI 5.1 -
OS size 22.9 GB -
OS updates 5 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7040 mAh 7040 mAh
Max charge power 15 W 20 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 60 min) Yes
Full charging time 2:58 hr -
Battery cycles 1200 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:57 hr -
Watching video 11:07 hr -
Gaming 05:44 hr -
Standby 155 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No -
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture - f/2.2
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 5 megapixels 5 megapixels
Aperture - f/2.0
Sensor CMOS -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.1 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode - Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 18 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
89.3 dB
83.7 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced October 2023 March 2025
Release date October 2023 March 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $219 $189
Successor - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus) -
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Hall-effect sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 20 W
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus):
    - Doesn't have S Pen support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, battery life, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Lenovo Idea Tab. But if the performance, gaming, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus).

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
4 (13.8%)
25 (86.2%)
Total votes: 29

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Jerry March 18, 2026 at 11:18 PM
Why do you rate the A9+'s camera so much better than the Idea Tab's?
0 Reply
Serhii March 19, 2026 at 08:09 AM
Appreciate your useful comment.
0 Reply