Galaxy Tab A9 vs Lenovo Tab M9
Here we compared two budget tablets: the 8.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (with MediaTek Helio G99) that was released on October 5, 2023, against the Lenovo Tab M9, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G80 and came out 10 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
- 69% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (508K versus 300K)
- Delivers 27% higher peak brightness (462 against 363 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- More energy-efficient CPU β Helio G99
- Has 33% more RAM: 4GB versus 3GB
- Smaller footprint: 11% more compact case (40.8 vs 45.7 square inches)
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
- 76% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 729 and 415 points
- The front-facing camera can record video at 1080p
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.7 inches | 9 inches |
| Resolution | 800 x 1340 pixels | 800 x 1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 5:3 |
| PPI | 179 ppi | 173 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.9% | 78.2% |
| RGB color space | 81.2% | 84.9% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 44 ms | 38 ms |
| Contrast | 1389:1 | 2382:1 |
Screen space comparison
Tab M9
9β³ (5:3 ratio) = 35.7 in2
Galaxy Tab A9
8.7β³ (5:3 ratio) = 33.4 in2
~7% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 211 mm (8.31 inches) | 215.4 mm (8.48 inches) |
| Width | 124.7 mm (4.91 inches) | 136.8 mm (5.39 inches) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 inches) | 8 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 333 g (11.75 oz) | 344 g (12.13 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray, Blue | Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 263 cm2 (40.8 inches2) | 295 cm2 (45.7 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (136th and 145th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (106th and 115th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G80 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 |
| L3 cache | - | 1 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 48 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~91.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1294 | 1018 |
| Single-core score | 729 | 415 |
| Multi-core score | 1943 | 1447 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 214958 | 140324 |
| GPU | 35695 | 26315 |
| Memory | 119172 | 64694 |
| UX | 138729 | 69650 |
| Total score | 508554 | 300983 |
| Samples | [3 tests] | [11 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | 1 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 130 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 8547 | 5845 |
| Video editing | 5137 | 4442 |
| Photo editing | 15786 | 13642 |
| Data manipulation | 7328 | 5698 |
| Writing score | 11901 | 8001 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-04-09 (Ji-Su 8090) | AnTuTu | 409449 |
| π 2025-10-30 (Trung) | AnTuTu | 508554 |
| π 2025-09-20 (ZION) | GeekBench GPU | 1294 |
| π 2025-09-20 (ZION) | GeekBench CPU | 729 / 1943 |
| π 2025-09-20 (ZION) | AnTuTu | 511895 |
Lenovo Tab M9
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 512 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 | Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) |
| ROM | One UI 5.1 | ZUI 15.1 |
Battery
| Capacity | 5100 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Max charge power | 15 W | 10 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | No |
| Full charging time | 2:30 hr | 4:00 hr |
| Web browsing | 09:04 hr | 09:21 hr |
| Watching video | 13:21 hr | 12:41 hr |
| Gaming | 05:24 hr | 05:10 hr |
| Standby | 143 hr | 146 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 2 megapixels | 2 megapixels |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 720p at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 13 | 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | October 2023 | December 2022 |
| Release date | October 2023 | March 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $135 |
| Successor | - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | - |
| SAR (body) | 0.51 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Hall-effect sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 10 W |
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab A9:
- Doesn't have S Pen support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 32