Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ vs OnePlus Pad 3
Here we compared two tablets: the 13.1-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (with Exynos 1580) that was released on April 2, 2025, against the OnePlus Pad 3, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- Fingerprint scanner
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 3
- 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3317K versus 1264K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Comes with 2050 mAh larger battery capacity: 12140 vs 10090 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 45W)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Delivers 12% higher peak brightness (848 against 756 nits)
- 22% higher pixel density (315 vs 259 PPI)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13.1 inches | 13.2 inches |
| Resolution | 1800 x 2880 pixels | 2400 x 3392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 8:5 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 259 ppi | 315 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | 60-144 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 87.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 96.6% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 29 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1812:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 3
13.2″ (7:5 ratio) = 82.4 in2
Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
13.1″ (8:5 ratio) = 77.1 in2
~6% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 300.6 mm (11.83 inches) | 289.61 mm (11.4 inches) |
| Width | 194.7 mm (7.67 inches) | 209.66 mm (8.25 inches) |
| Thickness | 6 mm (0.24 inches) | 5.97 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 664 g (23.42 oz) | 675 g (23.81 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray, Blue | Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | No |
| Area | 585 cm2 (90.7 inches2) | 607 cm2 (94.1 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.68/5) | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (73rd and 34th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (55th and 25th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1580 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 2900 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720 |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Xclipse 540 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1331.2 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 6952 | 24691 |
| Single-core score | 1376 | 3003 |
| Multi-core score | 3860 | 9307 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 484087 | 1061523 |
| GPU | 303990 | 1152696 |
| Memory | 198256 | 369778 |
| UX | 277797 | 733417 |
| Total score | 1264130 | 3317414 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [4 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | 82% |
| Graphics test | 5 FPS | 19 FPS |
| Graphics score | 655 | 2544 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 45 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 50 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 46 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 40 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 11865 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 12398 | 13279 |
| Video editing | 7114 | 6340 |
| Photo editing | 23206 | 25239 |
| Data manipulation | 10983 | 15200 |
| Writing score | 16063 | 18634 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-11 (Jackie) | AnTuTu | 1264130 |
| 📘 2025-10-31 (Thailand) | AnTuTu | 1228241 |
OnePlus Pad 3
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Harsh) | AnTuTu | 3242325 |
| 📘 2026-07-10 (Даниил Oneplus Fan) | AnTuTu | 3286274 |
| 📘 2026-06-20 (SusGo0d) | AnTuTu | 3188009 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 -> Afera666 | AnTuTu | 3612786 |
| 📘 2026-03-30 (Shakeel) | AnTuTu | 3317414 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 |
| ROM | One UI 8.5 | Oxygen OS 15 |
| OS size | 13 GB | - |
| OS updates | 0 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 10090 mAh | 12140 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 37 min) | Yes (40% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:45 hr | 1:29 hr |
| Battery cycles | 2000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | - | 06:01 hr |
| Watching video | - | 12:27 hr |
| Gaming | - | 07:31 hr |
| Standby | - | 77 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 12 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | - |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | No |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2025 | June 2025 |
| Release date | April 2025 | June 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $649 |
| SAR (body) | 0.8 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the OnePlus Pad 3 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 27