Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra vs Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
72
out of 100
VS
49
out of 100
Here we compared two tablets: the 14.6-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2) that was released on July 26, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- 3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1750K versus 582K)
- Has 3x more RAM: 12GB versus 4GB
- Has a 3.6 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 4160 mAh larger battery capacity: 11200 vs 7040 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Delivers 40% higher peak brightness (642 against 457 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Thinner bezels – 9.9% more screen real estate
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 15W)
- Fingerprint scanner
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
- Much smaller footprint: 36% more compact case (67.3 vs 105.5 square inches)
- Weighs 252 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| Size | 14.6 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 1848 x 2960 pixels | 1200 x 1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 8:5 |
| PPI | 239 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | No |
| Max rated brightness | 930 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | No |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 80.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - |
| RGB color space | 98.2% | 94.2% |
| PWM | 240 Hz | Not detected |
| Response time | 3 ms | 42 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | 1409:1 |
Screen space comparison
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
14.6″ (16:10 ratio) = 95.8 in2
Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
11″ (8:5 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~76% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 326.4 mm (12.85 inches) | 257.1 mm (10.12 inches) |
| Width | 208.6 mm (8.21 inches) | 168.7 mm (6.64 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.5 mm (0.22 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 732 g (25.82 oz) | 480 g (16.93 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | No |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Yellow | Silver, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | No |
| Area | 681 cm2 (105.5 inches2) | 434 cm2 (67.2 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.81/5) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (60th and 126th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (44th and 98th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max clock | 3360 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X3 |
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 680 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2089 GFLOPS | ~430.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 9753 | 1405 |
| Single-core score | 2127 | 908 |
| Multi-core score | 5667 | 2072 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 605896 | 245267 |
| GPU | 452910 | 57538 |
| Memory | 229430 | 108723 |
| UX | 462701 | 170923 |
| Total score | 1750937 | 582451 |
| Samples | [134 tests] | [14 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 9 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1153 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | 96% | - |
| Graphics test | 21 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 24 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 21 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 18 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 5622 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 79% | - |
| Graphics test | 22 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3829 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 10572 |
| Video editing | - | 4298 |
| Photo editing | - | 22564 |
| Data manipulation | - | 8881 |
| Writing score | - | 13360 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
No benchmark results yet
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand) | AnTuTu 12 | 704103 |
| 📘 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 1246 |
| 📘 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 917 / 1939 |
| 📘 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 907 / 2014 |
| 📘 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+) | AnTuTu 11 | 582451 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) | Android 13 |
| ROM | One UI 6.1 | One UI 5.1 |
| OS size | 40 GB | 22.9 GB |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 11200 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 15 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (32% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:08 hr | 2:58 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | 08:11 hr | 08:57 hr |
| Watching video | 12:20 hr | 11:07 hr |
| Gaming | 07:26 hr | 05:44 hr |
| Standby | 165 hr | 155 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | - | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 12 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4000 x 3000 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | - |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Additional lens | 12 MP | - |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | Yes |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | July 2023 | October 2023 |
| Release date | August 2023 | October 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $219 |
| Successor | - | - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus) |
| SAR (head) | 0.93 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus):
- Doesn't have S Pen support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 6