Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro vs Oppo Pad 3 Pro

76 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
VS
76 out of 100
Oppo Pad 3 Pro

Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 13-inch Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on May 31, 2024, against the Oppo Pad 3 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro
  • Has a 0.9 inch larger screen size
  • Comes with 1990 mAh larger battery capacity: 11500 vs 9510 mAh
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad 3 Pro
  • Weighs 93 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro and Oppo Pad 3 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
68.6
(Good)
Value Index
49.4
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 13 inches 12.1 inches
Resolution 2064 x 3096 pixels 2120 x 3000 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 7:5
PPI 286 ppi 304 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 900 nits 900 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate - 540 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 87.6% 85.2%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Screen space comparison
iQOO Pad 2 Pro
13″ (3:2 ratio) = 78 in2
Pad 3 Pro
12.1″ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
~12% more screen space

Design and build

Height 289.56 mm (11.4 inches) 268.66 mm (10.58 inches)
Width 198.32 mm (7.81 inches) 195.06 mm (7.68 inches)
Thickness 6.64 mm (0.26 inches) 6.49 mm (0.26 inches)
Weight 679 g (23.95 oz) 586 g (20.67 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray, Blue Gold, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 574 cm2 (89 inches2) 524 cm2 (81.3 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio
87.6%
85.2%
Tablet Ranking (45th and 46th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (31st and 32nd place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro and Oppo Pad 3 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max clock 3400 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Immortalis-G720 MC12 Adreno 750
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 903-1000 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro and Oppo Pad 3 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2261
2179
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
7567
6500
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 15782 -
Single-core score 2261 2179
Multi-core score 7567 6500
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2347116
2333285
CPU 676003 643259
GPU 788281 818824
Memory 368524 348314
UX 514308 522888
Total score 2347116 2333285
Samples [64 tests] [298 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1831
1641
Stability 91% 95%
Graphics test 14 FPS 12 FPS
Graphics score 1831 1641
3DMark Solar Bay
Pad 3 Pro +9%
8285
Graphics test 29 FPS 32 FPS
Section 1 32 FPS 35 FPS
Section 2 29 FPS 32 FPS
Section 3 25 FPS 27 FPS
Graphics score 7609 8285
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability - 94%
Graphics test - 28 FPS
Graphics score - 4700
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4200 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 Android 14
ROM OriginOS 4 ColorOS 14.1

Battery

Capacity 11500 mAh 9510 mAh
Max charge power 66 W 67 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes Yes (65% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 0:56 hr

Main camera

Matrix 13 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 4160 x 3120 4160 x 3120
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 13 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 13 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 23 mm
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 3264 x 2448
Aperture - f/2.3
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size - 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - Yes
NFC* Yes No
Infrared port No No
Network
Type of SIM card No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 8.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced May 2024 October 2024
Release date June 2024 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $470 $500
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 66 W Yes, 67 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

Both tablets have similar specs and test results. Despite this, we would choose the Vivo iQOO Pad 2 Pro, as it has better expert reviews.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
9 (52.9%)
8 (47.1%)
Total votes: 17

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!