Vivo iQOO Pad Ultra vs OnePlus Pad 4
90
out of 100
VS
90
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 8.8-inch Vivo iQOO Pad Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6) that was released on September 29, 2026, against the OnePlus Pad 4, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
- 13% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4518K versus 4003K)
- Much smaller footprint: 59% more compact case (38.6 vs 94.2 square inches)
- More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
- AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- Weighs 374 grams less
- 11% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3860 and 3467 points
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 4
- Has a 4.4 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 4360 mAh larger battery capacity: 13380 vs 9020 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.8 inches | 13.2 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 2304 pixels | 2400 x 3392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 309 ppi | 315 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 160 nits | 700 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 1000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 540 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 87.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 98.8% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 30 ms |
| Contrast | - | 1060:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 4
13.2″ (7:5 ratio) = 82.4 in2
iQOO Pad Ultra
8.8″ (16:10 ratio) = 34.8 in2
~136% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 197.4 mm (7.77 inches) | 289.71 mm (11.41 inches) |
| Width | 126.3 mm (4.97 inches) | 209.76 mm (8.26 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.7 mm (0.22 inches) | 5.94 mm (0.23 inches) |
| Weight | 298 g (10.51 oz) | 672 g (23.7 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Advanced cooling | Active fan | - |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver | Green, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 249 cm2 (38.6 inches2) | 608 cm2 (94.2 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (8th and 6th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (6th and 5th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 5010 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 3 + 3) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 3.74 GHz: - 3 cores at 4.03 GHz: - 2 cores at 5.01 GHz: |
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
| L3 cache | - | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 2 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 850 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1450 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4454.4 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 32608 | 27891 |
| Single-core score | 3860 | 3467 |
| Multi-core score | 11703 | 10377 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1322001 | 1127624 |
| GPU | 1594848 | 1462424 |
| Memory | 593523 | 489729 |
| UX | 1008031 | 923935 |
| Total score | 4518403 | 4003712 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
Recent User Tests
Vivo iQOO Pad Ultra
No benchmark results yet
OnePlus Pad 4
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-24 (Worms Armageddon) | AnTuTu 11 | 4003712 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | - | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | - | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| ROM | OriginOS 7 | OxygenOS 16 |
| OS size | - | 38 GB |
| OS updates | - | 3 years |
| Security updates | - | 4 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 9020 mAh | 13380 mAh |
| Max charge power | 66 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | - | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September 2026 | April 2026 |
| Release date | October 2026 | April 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1099 | $630 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 66 W | Yes, 67 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display and design are more important to you, then choose the Vivo iQOO Pad Ultra. But if the camera, battery life, connectivity, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the OnePlus Pad 4.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1