Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro vs Onn 11" Tablet (2026)
Here we compared two budget tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro (with MediaTek Helio G100) that was released on October 30, 2025, against the Onn 11" Tablet (2026), which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
- Comes with 1300 mAh larger battery capacity: 8800 vs 7500 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- 33% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (570K versus 429K)
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- The front-facing camera can record video at 1080p
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Onn 11" Tablet (2026)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1900 pixels | 1280 x 1840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 4:3 |
| PPI | 204 ppi | 204 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | - | No |
| Max rated brightness | 420 nits | 350 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 81.6% |
Screen space comparison
11" Tablet (2026)
11″ (4:3 ratio) = 58.1 in2
Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~6% more screen space
Design and build
| Height | 254.6 mm (10.02 inches) | 278.1 mm (10.95 inches) |
| Width | 166.1 mm (6.54 inches) | 165.1 mm (6.5 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 12.7 mm (0.5 inches) |
| Weight | 513 g (18.1 oz) | 480 g (16.93 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Silver, Blue, Pink, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2) | 459 cm2 (71.2 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (115th and 133rd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (89th and 105th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 1585 |
| Single-core score | 720 | 715 |
| Multi-core score | 1971 | 1953 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 219481 | 126423 |
| GPU | 48406 | 66375 |
| Memory | 146071 | 124614 |
| UX | 156511 | 111691 |
| Total score | 570469 | 429103 |
| Samples | [74 tests] | Less than 3 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 8800 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | - | No |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 5 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 2 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 720p at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | - |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | - |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Category | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | October 2025 | May 2026 |
| Release date | November 2025 | May 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $167 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 0 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1