Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 vs OnePlus Pad

73 out of 100
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
VS
63 out of 100
OnePlus Pad

Here we compared two tablets: the 12.4-inch Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 (with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2) that was released on February 22, 2024, against the OnePlus Pad, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9000 and came out 1 year before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
  • Delivers 90% higher peak brightness (849 against 446 nits)
  • 51% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1797K versus 1190K)
  • Shows 13% longer battery life (24:53 vs 22:00 hours)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 67W)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • 15% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1942 and 1691 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 and OnePlus Pad crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
61.4
(Average)
Value Index
58.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.4 inches 11.61 inches
Resolution 2032 x 3048 pixels 2000 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 7:5
PPI 295 ppi 296 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-144 Hz) No
Max rated brightness 900 nits 500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 85.8% 84.2%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.8%
PWM - 60 Hz
Response time - 20 ms
Contrast - 1481:1
Screen space comparison
Pad 6S Pro 12.4
12.4″ (3:2 ratio) = 71 in2
OnePlus Pad
11.61″ (7:5 ratio) = 63.8 in2
~11% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
849 nits
446 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 278.7 mm (10.97 inches) 258.03 mm (10.16 inches)
Width 191.58 mm (7.54 inches) 189.41 mm (7.46 inches)
Thickness 6.26 mm (0.25 inches) 6.54 mm (0.26 inches)
Weight 590 g (20.81 oz) 552 g (19.47 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Green Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button No
Area 534 cm2 (82.7 inches2) 489 cm2 (75.8 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio
85.8%
84.2%
Tablet Ranking (56th and 88th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (40th and 65th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 and OnePlus Pad
SoC
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Max clock 3200 MHz 3050 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A710
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X3
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-A710
- 1 core at 3.05 GHz: Cortex-X2
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek APU 590
GPU
Graphics Adreno 740 Mali-G710 MC10
GPU shading units 1536 640
GPU clock 680 MHz 848 MHz
FLOPS ~2089 GFLOPS ~1085.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 and OnePlus Pad
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1942
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
5624
Compute Score (GPU)
8800
Compute Score (GPU) 8800 6296
Single-core score 1942 1691
Multi-core score 5624 4386
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1797716
1190167
CPU 587367 410160
GPU 435124 253720
Memory 304507 203220
UX 470718 323067
Total score 1797716 1190167
Samples [2 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 7 FPS 6 FPS
Graphics score 927 787
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 20 FPS -
Section 1 23 FPS -
Section 2 20 FPS -
Section 3 17 FPS -
Graphics score 5245 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 96% -
Graphics test 22 FPS -
Graphics score 3721 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-10-24 (AJEG)AnTuTu 111797716
📘 2025-09-15 (Party_imp)AnTuTu 111726668
OnePlus Pad
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-10-25 (Akash)AnTuTu 111190167

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory clock 4200 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 15)
ROM HyperOS 2.0 OxygenOS 15
OS size - 23 GB

Battery

Capacity 10000 mAh 9510 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 67 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (88% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:38 hr 1:18 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:54 hr 08:15 hr
Watching video 09:32 hr 12:45 hr
Gaming 06:50 hr 05:59 hr
Standby 171 hr 112 hr
General battery life
24:53 hr
22:00 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution - 4160 x 3120
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion - No
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.2
Focal length - 23 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 8 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.3
Sensor OmniVision OV32D CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 No
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes No
Infrared port No No
Network
Type of SIM card No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Stereo 4.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced February 2024 February 2023
Release date February 2024 April 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $549 $479
Successor - Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 - OnePlus Pad 3
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Keyboard weight 535 g 360 g
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Yes, 67 W
Further details
Notes on Pad 6S Pro 12.4:
    - Has 6 speakers.
    - NFC only works for file transfer.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
11 (84.6%)
2 (15.4%)
Total votes: 13

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!