Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
87
out of 100
VS
74
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 14-inch Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on May 22, 2025, against the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- Has a 2.8 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 3150 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 8850 mAh
- 58% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2963K versus 1880K)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 67W)
- Thinner bezels – 6.3% more screen real estate
- OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- 25% higher pixel density (344 vs 275 PPI)
- Much smaller footprint: 31% more compact case (67.6 vs 98.3 square inches)
- Weighs 109 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 14 inches | 11.2 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2136 x 3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 275 ppi | 344 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | - | 800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1600 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 85.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 99.3% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 27 ms |
| Contrast | - | 1338:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 7 Ultra
14″ (3:2 ratio) = 90.5 in2
Pad 7 Pro
11.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~56% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 305.82 mm (12.04 inches) | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) |
| Width | 207.47 mm (8.17 inches) | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm (0.2 inches) | 6.18 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 609 g (21.48 oz) | 500 g (17.64 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Black, Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 634 cm2 (98.4 inches2) | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (19th and 51st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (15th and 37th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Xiaomi Xring O1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3700 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | - | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Adreno 735 |
| GPU shading units | 2048 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1392 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5701.6 GFLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 20977 | 10004 |
| Single-core score | 2737 | 1873 |
| Multi-core score | 9191 | 4947 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 937172 | 588596 |
| GPU | 996086 | 516242 |
| Memory | 409648 | 308105 |
| UX | 620146 | 468006 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 1880949 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [7 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 93% | 95% |
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | 8 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2510 | 1053 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 37 FPS | 19 FPS |
| Section 1 | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| Section 2 | 38 FPS | 19 FPS |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | 16 FPS |
| Graphics score | 9767 | 5082 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 19150 | 15027 |
| Video editing | 7129 | 7550 |
| Photo editing | 29727 | 27701 |
| Data manipulation | 18881 | 14274 |
| Writing score | 21285 | 18652 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
No benchmark results yet
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-28 (Sigmos12345) | AnTuTu | 1798346 |
| 📘 2026-04-23 (Noli) | AnTuTu | 1797350 |
| 📘 2026-01-09 (Eytuzi) | AnTuTu | 1792363 |
| 📘 2025-11-30 (BeddXII) | AnTuTu | 1928866 |
| 📘 2025-11-28 (Niko) | AnTuTu | 1903303 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
| OS size | - | 32 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 12000 mAh | 8850 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (53% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:13 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 08:06 hr |
| Watching video | - | 09:41 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:01 hr |
| Standby | - | 176 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8160 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | Omnivision OV32D |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May 2025 | October 2024 |
| Release date | May 2025 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $459 |
| Successor | - | - Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 67 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7 Ultra:
- The Nano Soft screen model is 10g heavier.
- NFC is supported for data transfer only.
Notes on Pad 7 Pro:
- The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 50