Home > Tablet comparison > Xiaomi Pad 7 vs Honor Pad 10 – which one to choose?

Xiaomi Pad 7 vs Honor Pad 10

70 out of 100
Xiaomi Pad 7
VS
67 out of 100
Honor Pad 10
Pad 7
Pad 10

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Pad 7 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3) that was released on October 29, 2024, against the Honor Pad 10, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
8 / 256 GB
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments (1)

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7
  • 62% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1697K versus 1048K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • 38% higher pixel density (344 vs 249 PPI)
  • Much smaller footprint: 12% more compact case (67.6 vs 77 square inches)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 35W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • 60% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1843 and 1150 points
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad 10
  • Has a 0.9 inch larger screen size
  • Comes with 1250 mAh larger battery capacity: 10100 vs 8850 mAh
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Pad 7 and Honor Pad 10 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Pad 7
86
Pad 10
88
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Pad 7
51
Pad 10
47
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Pad 7
66
Pad 10
46
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Pad 7
46
Pad 10
27
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Pad 7
79
Pad 10
95*
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Pad 7
70
Pad 10
65
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Pad 7
70
Pad 10
67*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
82.4
(Good)
Value Index
74.7
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
Pad 7
vs
Pad 10

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11.2 inches 12.1 inches
Resolution 2136 x 3200 pixels 1600 x 2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 16:10
PPI 344 ppi 249 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate - Yes
Max rated brightness 800 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 85.7% 85.4%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 97.3% -
PWM Not detected -
Response time 23 ms -
Contrast 952:1 -
Screen space comparison
Pad 10
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Pad 7
11.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Pad 7
813 nits
Pad 10
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) 277.1 mm (10.91 inches)
Width 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) 179.3 mm (7.06 inches)
Thickness 6.18 mm (0.24 inches) 6.3 mm (0.25 inches)
Weight 500 g (17.64 oz) 525 g (18.52 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Green Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) 497 cm2 (77 inches2)
Repairability Average (2.74/5) Good (3.07/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 208 drops Bad (E) · 5 drops
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Pad 7
85.7%
Pad 10
85.4%
Tablet Ranking (62nd and 75th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (46th and 57th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Pad 7 and Honor Pad 10
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Max clock 2800 MHz 2630 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 4 + 3) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 3 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X4		 - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)
- 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)
L3 cache - 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 732 Adreno 720
GPU shading units 768 512
GPU clock 950 MHz 975 MHz
FLOPS ~1459.2 GFLOPS ~998.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Pad 7 and Honor Pad 10
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Pad 7 +60%
1843
Pad 10
1150
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Pad 7 +60%
4978
Pad 10
3103
Compute Score (GPU)
Pad 7 +116%
8926
Pad 10
4133
Compute Score (GPU) 8926 4133
Single-core score 1843 1150
Multi-core score 4978 3103
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Pad 7 +62%
1697444
Pad 10
1048658
CPU 552288 379212
GPU 419835 215650
Memory 290516 198436
UX 434805 255360
Total score 1697444 1048658
Samples [18 tests] [2 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Pad 7
967
Pad 10
n/a
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 7 FPS -
Graphics score 967 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Pad 7
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH)Geekbench 6 GPU9571
📘 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH)Geekbench 6 CPU1884 / 5226
📘 2026-07-05 (Aditay)AnTuTu 111672445
📘 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade)Geekbench 6 CPU1918 / 5161
📘 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade)AnTuTu 111776424
Add View all (29)
Honor Pad 10
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-11 (Snowmen)AnTuTu 111048658
📘 2026-05-24 (Aleks)AnTuTu 111019587
Add View all (2)

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 4200 MHz -
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Memory card No -

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 2.0 MagicOS 10
OS size 32 GB -
OS updates 5 years 0 years

Battery

Capacity 8850 mAh 10100 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 35 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 1:20 hr -
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1400 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:46 hr -
Watching video 15:40 hr -
Gaming 07:07 hr -
Standby 128 hr -
General battery life
Pad 7
26:39 hr
Pad 10
n/a
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 13 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 4160 x 3120 3264 x 2448
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS No
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 13 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 13 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Sensor Omnivision OV13B10 -
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution - 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.3 f/2.2
Sensor Omnivision OV08D10 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
NFC* No No
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* - 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot - No
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 6.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness
Pad 7
90.4 dB
Pad 10
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced October 2024 May 2025
Release date October 2024 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $355
Successor - Xiaomi Pad 8 -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass		 - Accelerometer
Bundled charger Yes, 45 W Yes, 35 W
Further details
Notes on Pad 7:
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, performance, gaming, connectivity, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Pad 7. But if the battery life and software are more of a priority – go for the Honor Pad 10.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
96 (80.7%)
23 (19.3%)
Total votes: 119

Related comparisons

1. Honor Pad 10 vs Honor Pad 9
2. Honor Pad 10 vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
3. Honor Pad 10 vs Apple iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025)
4. Honor Pad 10 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad
5. Honor Pad 10 vs Lenovo Tab P12
6. Honor Pad 10 vs Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
7. Honor Pad 10 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024)
8. Xiaomi Pad 7 vs Xiaomi Pad 6
9. Xiaomi Pad 7 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S9
10. Xiaomi Pad 7 vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Compare other tablets (80+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
nattawut October 21, 2025 at 02:34 PM
I noticed a clear inaccuracy in the comparison scores on NanoReview between the Xiaomi Pad 7 and the Honor Pad 10. The site gives the Honor Pad 10 a higher score for its display, which honestly doesn’t make sense. The only advantage it has is a slightly larger screen size. In every other aspect, the Xiaomi Pad 7’s display is clearly superior — it has a much higher resolution, higher pixel density (DPI), a wider color gamut, and support for better visual technologies like Dolby Vision. There’s simply no logical reason for the Pad 10 to score higher in the display category. This seems like an error in NanoReview’s scoring system, and it really should be corrected to reflect the actual specifications and display performance.
+15 Reply
EnglishРусский