Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 vs Honor MagicPad 3 Pro

85 out of 100
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
VS
86 out of 100
Honor MagicPad 3 Pro

Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 12.5-inch Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on June 26, 2025, against the Honor MagicPad 3 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 80W)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor MagicPad 3 Pro
  • Comes with 1840 mAh larger battery capacity: 12450 vs 10610 mAh
  • 45% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4302K versus 2963K)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 33% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3662 and 2746 points
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 and Honor MagicPad 3 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
88.6
(Very good)
Value Index
74.6
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.5 inches 13.3 inches
Resolution 2136 x 3200 pixels 2136 x 3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 3:2
PPI 308 ppi 289 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 1000 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1100 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 86.8% 89%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 97.9% -
PWM Not detected -
Response time 30 ms -
Contrast 3415:1 -
Screen space comparison
MagicPad 3 Pro
13.3β€³ (3:2 ratio) = 81.6 in2
Pad 7S Pro 12.5
12.5β€³ (3:2 ratio) = 72.1 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 279.1 mm (10.99 inches) 293.9 mm (11.57 inches)
Width 192 mm (7.56 inches) 201.4 mm (7.93 inches)
Thickness 5.8 mm (0.23 inches) 5.8 mm (0.23 inches)
Weight 576 g (20.32 oz) 595 g (20.99 oz)
Waterproof No No
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Gray, Purple White, Gold, Gray
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button No
Area 536 cm2 (83.1 inches2) 592 cm2 (91.8 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (22nd and 20th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (17th and 15th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 and Honor MagicPad 3 Pro
SoC
Chipset Xiaomi Xring O1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 3400 MHz 4600 MHz
CPU cores 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache - 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 2048 1536
GPU clock 1392 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~5701.6 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 and Honor MagicPad 3 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
27970
Compute Score (GPU) 21512 27970
Single-core score 2746 3662
Multi-core score 8431 10848
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2963052
4302345
CPU 937172 1186224
GPU 996086 1478192
Memory 409648 582575
UX 620146 1055355
Total score 2963052 4302345
Samples [2 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 92% -
Graphics test 18 FPS -
Graphics score 2413 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Section 1 37 FPS -
Section 2 35 FPS -
Section 3 31 FPS -
Graphics score 9022 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 17566 -
Video editing 6957 -
Photo editing 27481 -
Data manipulation 15048 -
Writing score 19142 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo)AnTuTu 112842416
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Albert)CPU Throttle92%
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 GPU21512
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 CPU2746 / 8431
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)AnTuTu 112963052
Honor MagicPad 3 Pro
No benchmark results yet

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory clock 4800 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 2.0 MagicOS 10
OS size 31 GB -

Battery

Capacity 10610 mAh 12450 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 80 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes
Battery life tests
Web browsing 14:06 hr -
Watching video 21:34 hr -
Gaming 09:10 hr -
Standby 169 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution - 4160 x 3120
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
2) Macro: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Bokeh mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.0
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution - 2 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Stabilization - Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 9 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor Omnivision OV32D -
Sensor size 1/3.6" (β‰ˆ 0.28 inch) -
Pixel size 0.61 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.2
NFC* No No
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Type of SIM card No No
eSIM support* No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 6.0 8.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced June 2025 October 2025
Release date June 2025 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $460 $535
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Honor MagicPad 3 Pro. But if the camera, battery life, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
3 (30%)
7 (70%)
Total votes: 10

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!