Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 vs Oppo Pad Neo
Here we compared two tablets: the 9.7-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2) that was released on May 21, 2026, against the Oppo Pad Neo, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 2 years and 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 13
- Much smaller footprint: 30% more compact case (51.9 vs 74.4 square inches)
- Weighs 132 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad Neo
- Has a 1.7 inches larger screen size
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
- Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (33W versus 18W)
- 48% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 714 and 484 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | LTPS LCD |
| Size | 9.7 inches | 11.4 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2048 pixels | 1720 x 2408 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| PPI | 268 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 83.9% |
Design and build
| Height | 226.51 mm (8.92 inches) | 255.12 mm (10.04 inches) |
| Width | 147.97 mm (5.83 inches) | 188.04 mm (7.4 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.89 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 406 g (14.32 oz) | 538 g (18.98 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 335 cm2 (52 inches2) | 480 cm2 (74.3 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (98th and 118th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (73rd and 91st place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max clock | 2900 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 387 | 1364 |
| Single-core score | 484 | 714 |
| Multi-core score | 1558 | 1872 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 200538 | 250145 |
| GPU | 29602 | 43322 |
| Memory | 114287 | 116331 |
| UX | 138620 | 135748 |
| Total score | 511632 | 545546 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [178 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 1 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 138 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 7864 |
| Video editing | - | 5221 |
| Photo editing | - | 16373 |
| Data manipulation | - | 7872 |
| Writing score | - | 9249 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-04 (NiK0nvs) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 484 / 1558 |
Oppo Pad Neo
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 13 |
| ROM | - | ColorOS 13.2 |
Battery
| Capacity | 7600 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 33 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 50 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 2:00 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | May 2026 | January 2024 |
| Release date | May 2026 | January 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $260 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 18 W | Yes, 33 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1