Xiaomi Redmi K Pad vs Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
Here we compared two tablets: the 8.8-inch Xiaomi Redmi K Pad (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on June 26, 2025, against the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 and came out 2 years and 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
- 2.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3004K versus 1323K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 13
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 30% higher pixel density (403 vs 309 PPI)
- Much smaller footprint: 35% more compact case (42 vs 64.9 square inches)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
- Has a 2.2 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 1100 mAh larger battery capacity: 8600 vs 7500 mAh
- Fingerprint scanner
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.8 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 1880 x 3008 pixels | 1800 x 2880 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 403 ppi | 309 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max rated brightness | 700 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 83.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 23 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1486:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 6 Pro
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
Redmi K Pad
8.8″ (16:10 ratio) = 34.8 in2
~56% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 205.1 mm (8.07 inches) | 253.95 mm (10 inches) |
| Width | 132 mm (5.2 inches) | 165.18 mm (6.5 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) | 6.51 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 326 g (11.5 oz) | 490 g (17.28 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Black, Gold, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 271 cm2 (42 inches2) | 419 cm2 (65 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (29th and 66th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (22nd and 49th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
| Max clock | 3730 MHz | 3190 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.75 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X2 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 730 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 900 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~1843.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24373 | - |
| Single-core score | 2657 | 1771 |
| Multi-core score | 8298 | 4690 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 923460 | 484050 |
| GPU | 1042496 | 244968 |
| Memory | 407660 | 226305 |
| UX | 631143 | 367847 |
| Total score | 3004759 | 1323170 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 77% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 16 FPS | 6 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2157 | 863 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 38 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 40 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 38 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 9914 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 70% | 96% |
| Graphics test | - | 16 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2756 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17873 | - |
| Video editing | 6768 | - |
| Photo editing | 34918 | - |
| Data manipulation | 17855 | - |
| Writing score | 24733 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-12-09 -> Andre Suhen | AnTuTu | 3004759 |
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-10-27 (Jeff) | AnTuTu | 1323170 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | HyperOS 1.0 |
| OS size | 32 GB | 21 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 8600 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (55% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:02 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 10:39 hr |
| Watching video | - | 14:31 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:20 hr |
| Standby | - | 142 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 120 FPS (720p) |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX596 |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | - |
| Hybrid slot | No | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | April 2023 |
| Release date | June 2025 | April 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | $499 |
| Successor | - | - Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Keyboard weight | - | 430 g |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Yes, 67 W |
Further details
Notes on Redmi K Pad:
- The tablet features 2 USB Type-C 3.2 ports with Bypass charging and supports a magnetic stylus.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1