Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro vs Oppo Pad Neo
66
out of 100
VS
53
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4) that was released on September 24, 2025, against the Oppo Pad Neo, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 1 year and 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
- Comes with 4000 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 8000 mAh
- 81% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (986K versus 545K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 13
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- Reverse charging feature
- 74% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1239 and 714 points
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad Neo
- Weighs 72 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | LTPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 11.4 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 1720 x 2408 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 4:3 |
| PPI | 249 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max rated brightness | - | 400 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 650 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 83.9% |
| RGB color space | 96.6% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 28 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1764:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Redmi Pad 2 Pro
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Pad Neo
11.4″ (4:3 ratio) = 62.4 in2
~5% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 279.8 mm (11.02 inches) | 255.12 mm (10.04 inches) |
| Width | 181.7 mm (7.15 inches) | 188.04 mm (7.4 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) | 6.89 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 610 g (21.52 oz) | 538 g (18.98 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray, Purple | Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 508 cm2 (78.8 inches2) | 480 cm2 (74.3 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 208 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (78th and 118th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (59th and 91st place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max clock | 2700 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 810 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 895 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~458.2 GFLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 4784 | 1364 |
| Single-core score | 1239 | 714 |
| Multi-core score | 3286 | 1872 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 380886 | 250145 |
| GPU | 190421 | 43322 |
| Memory | 139368 | 116331 |
| UX | 276207 | 135748 |
| Total score | 986882 | 545546 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [178 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 1 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 138 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 7864 |
| Video editing | - | 5221 |
| Photo editing | - | 16373 |
| Data manipulation | - | 7872 |
| Writing score | - | 9249 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-03 (Deepa) | GeekBench GPU | 4784 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 (Deepa) | GeekBench CPU | 1239 / 3286 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 (Deepa) | AnTuTu | 986882 |
Oppo Pad Neo
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | ColorOS 13.2 |
| OS size | 34 GB | - |
| OS updates | 0 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 12000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 33 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (30% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 50 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:20 hr | 2:00 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 08:13 hr | - |
| Watching video | 11:17 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:52 hr | - |
| Standby | 233 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | January 2024 |
| Release date | September 2025 | January 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $260 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 33 W | Yes, 33 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2