ZTE Nubia Red Magic Nova vs Xiaomi Pad Mini

76 out of 100
ZTE Nubia Red Magic Nova
VS
83 out of 100
Xiaomi Pad Mini

Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 10.9-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic Nova (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on September 5, 2024, against the Xiaomi Pad Mini, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus and came out 1 year and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic Nova
  • Has a 2.1 inches larger screen size
  • Comes with 2600 mAh larger battery capacity: 10100 vs 7500 mAh
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 67W)
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad Mini
  • Shows 34% longer battery life (31:14 vs 23:20 hours)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
  • Delivers 31% higher peak brightness (678 against 518 nits)
  • 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2845K versus 2333K)
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
  • 29% higher pixel density (403 vs 312 PPI)
  • Much smaller footprint: 35% more compact case (42 vs 64.6 square inches)
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Red Magic Nova and Xiaomi Pad Mini crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
63.5
(Average)
Value Index
36.8
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 10.9 inches 8.8 inches
Resolution 1800 x 2880 pixels 1880 x 3008 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
PPI 312 ppi 403 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 550 nits 700 nits
HDR support - Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 840 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 82.6% 82.9%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.8%
PWM - Not detected
Response time - 24 ms
Contrast - 1195:1
Screen space comparison
Nubia Red Magic Nova
10.9″ (16:10 ratio) = 53.4 in2
Pad Mini
8.8″ (16:10 ratio) = 34.8 in2
~53% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Pad Mini +31%
678 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 253.3 mm (9.97 inches) 205.13 mm (8.08 inches)
Width 164.6 mm (6.48 inches) 132.03 mm (5.2 inches)
Thickness 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) 6.46 mm (0.25 inches)
Weight 530 g (18.69 oz) 326 g (11.5 oz)
Waterproof No No
Advanced cooling Active fan -
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black Gray, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button No
Area 417 cm2 (64.6 inches2) 271 cm2 (42 inches2)
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (47th and 28th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (33rd and 21st place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Red Magic Nova and Xiaomi Pad Mini
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Max clock 3400 MHz 3730 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Adreno 750 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 903-1000 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Red Magic Nova and Xiaomi Pad Mini
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Single-core score 2197 2990
Multi-core score 7410 9086
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Pad Mini +22%
2845550
CPU 643259 835859
GPU 818824 997763
Memory 348314 385910
UX 522888 626018
Total score 2333285 2845550
Samples [298 tests] [2 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 76%
Graphics test - 16 FPS
Graphics score - 2156
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 38 FPS
Section 1 - 40 FPS
Section 2 - 39 FPS
Section 3 - 34 FPS
Graphics score - 9951
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 17430
Video editing - 6789
Photo editing - 34216
Data manipulation - 17755
Writing score - 23961

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Red Magic Nova
No benchmark results yet
Xiaomi Pad Mini
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-01-20 (Butter)AnTuTu2845550
📘 2025-11-12 (Butter)AnTuTu2814063

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4200 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 Android 15
ROM REDMAGIC Space 9.5 HyperOS 2.0
OS size - 20 GB

Battery

Capacity 10100 mAh 7500 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 67 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (66% in 30 min) Yes (57% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:58 hr 1:00 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:05 hr 09:21 hr
Watching video 08:54 hr 14:30 hr
Gaming 06:38 hr 06:18 hr
Standby 155 hr 202 hr
General battery life
Pad Mini +34%
31:14 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 13 megapixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
-
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 13 MP
Aperture - f/2.2
Sensor - Omnivision OV13B10
Sensor size - 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 8 megapixels
Aperture - f/2.3
Sensor - Omnivision OV08F
Sensor size - 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.1 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
NFC* Yes No
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Type of SIM card No No
eSIM support* - No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 4.0 Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2024 September 2025
Release date September 2024 September 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $499 $429
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 67 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad Mini is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
1 (5%)
19 (95%)
Total votes: 20

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!