Intel Core Ultra 5 332 vs Ultra 5 322

We compared two 6-core laptop CPUs: the 2.5 GHz Intel Core Ultra 5 332 against the 2.5 GHz Ultra 5 322. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 762.5 MB/sec 846.1 MB/sec
Clang compilation 50 Klines/sec 48.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 190.2 pages/sec 206.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 234.4 Mpixels/sec 227.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 268 pages/sec 233.6 pages/sec
Background blur 39.4 images/sec 38.6 images/sec
Photo processing 78.3 images/sec 72.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 10.3 Mpixels/sec 9.81 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 30.9 GOps/sec -
Floating point math 41.2 GOps/sec -
Find prime numbers 117M Primes/sec -
Random string sorting 17.3M Strings/sec -
Data encryption 10.7 GBytes/sec -
Data compression 142.3 MBytes/sec -
Physics 1289 Frames/sec -
Extended instructions 12.8B Matrices/sec -
Sources: PassMark [3] – 24 samples

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 22.7 PPW 22.4 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 319.4 PPW 317.6 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 599.5 PPW 617.5 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 5 332 and Ultra 5 322

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 5, 2026 January 5, 2026
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Panther Lake Panther Lake
Model number 332 322
Integrated GPU Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)
Intel CPU rating (118th and 119th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 2 2
P-Threads 2 2
Base Frequency (P) 2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.4 GHz 4.4 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 4 4
E-Threads 4 4
Base Frequency (E) 1.9 GHz 1.9 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.3 GHz 3.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 6 6
Total Threads 6 6
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 25x 25x
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 12MB (shared) 12MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 2 nm 2 nm
TDP (PL1) 12-25 W (configurable) 12-25 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 55 W 55 W
Socket FCBGA2540 FCBGA2540
Peak Temperature 100°C 100°C
Laptop processors ranking (155th and 156th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2300 MHz 2300 MHz
Shading Units 256 256
TMUs 16 16
ROPs 8 8
Execution Units 4 4
TGP 25 W 25 W
iGPU FLOPS
1.2 TFLOPS
1.2 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-7467
- DDR5-6400
- LPDDR5X-7467
- DDR5-6400
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 5 332 official page Intel Core Ultra 5 322 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 12

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
1 (50%)
1 (50%)
Total votes: 2

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 5 322 or Ultra 5 332?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!