Intel Core Ultra 5 332 vs Ultra 5 322
54
out of 100
VS
54
out of 100
We compared two 6-core laptop CPUs: the 2.5 GHz Intel Core Ultra 5 332 against the 2.5 GHz Ultra 5 322. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 762.5 MB/sec | 846.1 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 50 Klines/sec | 48.2 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 190.2 pages/sec | 206.5 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 234.4 Mpixels/sec | 227.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 268 pages/sec | 233.6 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 39.4 images/sec | 38.6 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 78.3 images/sec | 72.3 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 10.3 Mpixels/sec | 9.81 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 30.9 GOps/sec | - |
| Floating point math | 41.2 GOps/sec | - |
| Find prime numbers | 117M Primes/sec | - |
| Random string sorting | 17.3M Strings/sec | - |
| Data encryption | 10.7 GBytes/sec | - |
| Data compression | 142.3 MBytes/sec | - |
| Physics | 1289 Frames/sec | - |
| Extended instructions | 12.8B Matrices/sec | - |
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 22.7 PPW | 22.4 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 319.4 PPW | 317.6 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 599.5 PPW | 617.5 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 5 332
No benchmark results yet
Intel Core Ultra 5 322
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-11-02 (cyqnus) | Cinebench 2026 | 0 / 1442 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 5 332 and Ultra 5 322General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | January 5, 2026 | January 5, 2026 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Panther Lake | Panther Lake |
| Model number | 332 | 322 |
| Integrated GPU | Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) | Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) |
Intel CPU rating (120th and 121st place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 2 | 2 |
| P-Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| E-Cores | 4 | 4 |
| E-Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base Frequency (E) | 1.9 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Total Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Total Threads | 6 | 6 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 25x | 25x |
| L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 2 nm | 2 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 12-25 W (configurable) | 12-25 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 55 W | 55 W |
| Socket | FCBGA2540 | FCBGA2540 |
| Peak Temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Laptop processors ranking (158th and 159th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2300 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Shading Units | 256 | 256 |
| TMUs | 16 | 16 |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| Execution Units | 4 | 4 |
| TGP | 25 W | 25 W |
iGPU FLOPS
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5X-7467 - DDR5-6400 |
- LPDDR5X-7467 - DDR5-6400 |
| Max. Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | No |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 5 332 official page | Intel Core Ultra 5 322 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 12 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2