Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX vs AMD Ryzen 3 210

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.4 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX with 20-cores against the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 3 210 with 4-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 210 and 255HX
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
  • Has 16 more physical cores
  • Has 22 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • More powerful Arc Graphics (4-Cores) integrated graphics: 1.9 vs 1.3 TFLOPS
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • 20% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2888 vs 2414 points
  • 11% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.2 GHz vs 4.7 GHz)
  • Around 12.8 GB/s (14%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (#48th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
18042
File compression 1140 MB/sec 667.6 MB/sec
Clang compilation 149.8 Klines/sec 42.7 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 312.2 pages/sec 148.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 423.9 Mpixels/sec 169.4 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 335.6 pages/sec 248.8 pages/sec
Background blur 64.1 images/sec 34.7 images/sec
Photo processing 111.8 images/sec 72.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 31.1 Mpixels/sec 9.09 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
48115
13573
Integer math 127 GOps/sec 37.9 GOps/sec
Floating point math 160.3 GOps/sec 23.6 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 400M Primes/sec 49M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 62.4M Strings/sec 19.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 39.4 GBytes/sec 8.6 GBytes/sec
Data compression 513.6 MBytes/sec 151.9 MBytes/sec
Physics 2916 Frames/sec 820 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 41.1B Matrices/sec 11.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 976 & 154 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
391.12
80.47

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 32 PPW 16.7 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 328 PPW 228.1 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 874.8 PPW 452.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 7.11 PPW 2.68 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-05 (Levi)Geekbench 6 CPU2907 / 17742
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-25 (Junebug)Cinebench 2024131 / 1759
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-17 (balihardik009)Cinebench 2024131 / 1820
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 (Verbickisd)Cinebench 2024125 / 1666
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-24 (Abhi)Geekbench 6 CPU2823 / 17264
AMD Ryzen 3 210
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and AMD Ryzen 3 210

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 6, 2025 January 7, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 4 (Hawk Point)
Model number 255HX -
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 740M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 380 -
Intel CPU rating (#29th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#106th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 1
P-Threads 8 2
Base Frequency (P) 2.4 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.2 GHz 4.7 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 3
E-Threads 12 6
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz 2.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.5 GHz 3.6 GHz
Total
Total Cores 20 4
Total Threads 20 8
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 24x 30x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 8MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Transistors - 20.9 billions
Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-55 W (configurable) 15-30 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 160 W -
Socket FCBGA-2114 FP8
Peak Temperature 105Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (33rd and 186th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 740M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 800 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1850 MHz 2500 MHz
Shading Units 512 256
TMUs 32 16
ROPs 16 8
Execution Units 64 4
TGP 14 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
1.9 TFLOPS
1.3 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - LPDDR5X-7500
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX official page AMD Ryzen 3 210 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 210 or Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!