Intel Core Ultra 7 265H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
70
out of 100
VS
73
out of 100
We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.2 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265H with 16-cores against the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
- Newer - released 6 months later
- More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
- Has 4 more physical cores
- Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
- More than 10° C higher critical temperature
- 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
- Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
- More powerful AMD Radeon 890M integrated graphics: 5.9 vs 4.7 TFLOPS
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (120th and 98th place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1310 MB/sec | 1270 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 122.7 Klines/sec | 131.2 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 405.7 pages/sec | 304 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 467.8 Mpixels/sec | 480.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 325.4 pages/sec | 316.2 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 66.5 images/sec | 74.1 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 150.8 images/sec | 135.3 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 24.4 Mpixels/sec | 32.6 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 85.4 GOps/sec | 124.4 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 108.9 GOps/sec | 78.3 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 335M Primes/sec | 129M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 40.7M Strings/sec | 48.5M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 26 GBytes/sec | 22.3 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 334.4 MBytes/sec | 446.6 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 2493 Frames/sec | 1911 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 26.8B Matrices/sec | 32B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 41.1 PPW | 23.6 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 550.3 PPW | 300.7 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 1214.3 PPW | 654.5 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 8.44 PPW | - |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
No benchmark results yet
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-10-31 (DavidchoGamer84) | Cinebench 2024 | 121 / 1277 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375General
| Vendor | Intel | Amd |
| Released | January 6, 2025 | July 24, 2024 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 5 (Strix Point) |
| Model number | 265H | 375 |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon 890M |
| Rival Equivalent | - AMD Ryzen 7 260 | - Intel Core i9 14900HX |
| Successor | - | - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 |
Intel CPU rating (#42nd place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#27th place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 6 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2.2 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| E-Cores | 10 | 8 |
| E-Threads | 10 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (E) | 1.7 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 4.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Total Cores | 16 | 12 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 22x | 20x |
| L1 Cache | 192K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 24MB (shared) | 24MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 20-28 W (configurable) | 15-54 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 115 W | - |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | FP8 |
| Peak Temperature | 110°C | 100°C |
Laptop processors ranking (52nd and 39th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Arc Graphics 140T | AMD Radeon 890M |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2300 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 8 | 16 |
| TGP | 35 W | 15 W |
iGPU FLOPS
More info: Radeon 890M compared to Arc 140T
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
- DDR5-5600 - LPDDR5X-8000 |
| Max. Memory Size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H official page | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 28 | 16 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 4