Home > CPU Comparison > Core Ultra 7 366H or Core Ultra 7 265H: what's better?

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Ultra 7 265H

67 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
VS
70 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H

We compared two 16-core laptop CPUs: the 2 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 366H against the 2.2 GHz Ultra 7 265H. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 265H and 366H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
  • Newer - released 1 year later
  • More modern manufacturing process – 2 versus 3 nanometers
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
  • More powerful Arc Graphics 140T integrated graphics: 4.7 vs 2.6 TFLOPS
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More than 10° C higher critical temperature
  • 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Core Ultra 7 366H
vs
Core Ultra 7 265H

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1330 MB/sec 1310 MB/sec
Clang compilation 122.4 Klines/sec 122.7 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 435.8 pages/sec 405.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 507.4 Mpixels/sec 467.8 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 285.5 pages/sec 325.4 pages/sec
Background blur 70.7 images/sec 66.5 images/sec
Photo processing 174.4 images/sec 150.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 26.9 Mpixels/sec 24.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 83.9 GOps/sec 85.4 GOps/sec
Floating point math 104 GOps/sec 108.9 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 328M Primes/sec 335M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 40.3M Strings/sec 40.7M Strings/sec
Data encryption 26.1 GBytes/sec 26 GBytes/sec
Data compression 331.2 MBytes/sec 334.4 MBytes/sec
Physics 2892 Frames/sec 2493 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 27.3B Matrices/sec 26.8B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 270 & 1114 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 46.3 PPW 41.1 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 661.3 PPW 550.3 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1348 PPW 1214.3 PPW
Blender / Watt 7.94 PPW 8.44 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and Ultra 7 265H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 5, 2026 January 6, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Panther Lake Arrow Lake
Model number 366H 265H
Integrated GPU Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) Arc Graphics 140T
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360 - AMD Ryzen 7 260
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
Intel CPU rating (55th and 43rd place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 6
P-Threads 4 6
Base Frequency (P) 2.0 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.8 GHz 5.3 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 10
E-Threads 12 10
Base Frequency (E) 1.6 GHz 1.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.6 GHz 4.5 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 16
Total Threads 16 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 20x 22x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2560K (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 2 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 15-25 W (configurable) 20-28 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 80 W 115 W
Socket FCBGA2540 FCBGA-2049
Peak Temperature 100°C 110°C
Laptop processors ranking (67th and 54th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) Arc Graphics 140T
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2500 MHz 2300 MHz
Shading Units 512 1024
TMUs 32 64
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units 4 8
TGP 25 W 35 W
iGPU FLOPS
Core Ultra 7 366H
2.6 TFLOPS
Core Ultra 7 265H +81%
4.7 TFLOPS
More info: Arc 140T compared to Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8533
- DDR5-7200		 - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 115.2 GB/s -
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 366H official page Intel Core Ultra 7 265H official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Competitors

1. Intel Core Ultra 7 265H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2. Intel Core Ultra 7 265H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
3. Intel Core Ultra 7 265H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
4. Intel Core Ultra 7 265H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5. Intel Core Ultra 7 265H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
7. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360
8. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
9. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
10. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 265H or Ultra 7 366H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский