Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Apple M5 Max (40-сore GPU)

We compared two CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (desktop) with 24-cores against the 4.61 GHz Apple M5 Max (40-сore GPU) (laptop) with 18-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS

Key Differences

What are the key differences between GPU) and Plus
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-7200 RAM
  • Has 6 more physical cores
Advantages of Apple M5 Max (40-сore GPU)
  • More powerful Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core) integrated graphics: 16.6 vs 2 TFLOPS
  • Around 499.2 GB/s (433%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • 16% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 4358 vs 3750 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 595 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 9722 8487
Cinebench Scores (3rd and 4th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 2000 MB/sec 2990 MB/sec
Clang compilation 297.3 Klines/sec 271.1 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 635.2 pages/sec 811.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 716 Mpixels/sec 764 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 447.5 pages/sec 457.1 pages/sec
Background blur 116 images/sec 106.1 images/sec
Photo processing 210.5 images/sec 303.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 59 Mpixels/sec 47.8 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 175.8 GOps/sec 132.6 GOps/sec
Floating point math 229.2 GOps/sec 186.1 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 612M Primes/sec 553M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 96.8M Strings/sec 84.9M Strings/sec
Data encryption 59 GBytes/sec 40.8 GBytes/sec
Data compression 803 MBytes/sec 689.6 MBytes/sec
Physics 4038 Frames/sec 6847 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 63.4B Matrices/sec 33.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4]1837 & 125 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 19.9 PPW 24.6 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 219.2 PPW 302 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 547.7 PPW 574.7 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.92 PPW 5.76 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-12 (coolguy)Cinebench 20260 / 8872
📘 2026-06-25 (Adnan)Cinebench 2024144 / 2490
📘 2026-06-13 (sparehobos)Cinebench 2024147 / 2614
📘 2026-04-11 (Daniel Comeau)Cinebench 2026568 / 8929
📘 2026-04-07 (IdiotStick)Cinebench 2026595 / 9722
Apple M5 Max (40-сore GPU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-03 -> Apple loverGeekBench4365 / 30166
📘 2026-07-03 -> Apple loverCinebench 2026734 / 9428

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Apple M5 Max (40-сore GPU)

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released March 12, 2026 March 3, 2026
Type Desktop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv9
Codename Arrow Lake Apple M5
Model number 270K+ T6051
Integrated GPU Arc iGPU (4-Cores) Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 9950X -
Intel CPU rating (#1st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 18
P-Threads 8 18
Base Frequency (P) 3.7 GHz 4.61 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 -
E-Threads 16 -
Base Frequency (E) 3.2 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.7 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 18
Total Threads 24 18
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 37x 46x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 32MB (shared)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Transistors 17.8 billions 28 billions
Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 100 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 250 W -
Socket FCLGA-1851 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 105°C 100°C
Die Size - 166.85 mm²
Desktop CPU ranking (#1st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz -
GPU Boost Clock 2000 MHz 1620 MHz
Shading Units 512 5120
TMUs 32 320
ROPs 16 160
Execution Units 64 640
TGP 14 W -
iGPU FLOPS
16.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-7200 - LPDDR5X-9600
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 32
Max. Memory Bandwidth 115.2 GB/s 614.4 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus official page -
PCI Express Version 5.0 -
PCI Express Lanes 24 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
19 (52.8%)
17 (47.2%)
Total votes: 36

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M5 Max (40-сore GPU) or Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Phenro June 14, 2026 at 08:56 AM
hahahahaha poor ass apple's greatest cant beat a 399 dollar CPU.
+1 Reply
akp831 June 14, 2026 at 02:29 PM
Apple M5 does have better Efficiency and a better GPU though
+2 Reply
Avatar
Intel Arc Raises Eyebrows Into Arcs. June 15, 2026 at 11:51 AM
why are we comparing desktop CPU to mobile, of course it will win when it has 24 cores. You can compare this to the core ultra 9 285hx and see that it loses as well when it is only found in laptops more than $4,000 USD. :>>>
0 Reply