Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Apple M5 Ultra (36-Core)

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.5 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24-cores against the 4.61 GHz Apple M5 Ultra (36-Core) with 36-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS

Key Differences

What are the key differences between (36-Core) and 285
Advantages of Apple M5 Ultra (36-Core)
  • Newer - released 1 year and 8 months later
  • Around 1126.4 GB/s (1100%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • Supports up to 512 GB LPDDR5X-9600 RAM
  • Has 12 more physical cores
  • 38% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 4331 vs 3134 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (68th and 1st place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1380 MB/sec -
Clang compilation 221 Klines/sec -
HTML 5 Browser 407 pages/sec -
PDF Renderer 501.6 Mpixels/sec -
Text processing 356.4 pages/sec -
Background blur 81.2 images/sec -
Photo processing 141.3 images/sec -
Ray tracing 47.2 Mpixels/sec -
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 23.2 PPW -
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 310.2 PPW -
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and Apple M5 Ultra (36-Core)

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released December 18, 2024 August 25, 2026
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv9
Codename Arrow Lake Apple M5
Model number 285 -
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics Apple M5 Ultra GPU (80-core)
Intel CPU rating (#20th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 24
P-Threads 8 24
Base Frequency (P) 2.5 GHz 4.61 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.6 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 12
E-Threads 16 12
Base Frequency (E) 1.9 GHz 4.38 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 36
Total Threads 24 36
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 25x 46x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) -
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 65 W -
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 182 W -
Socket FCLGA-1851 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 105°C 100°C
Desktop CPU ranking (30th and 1st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc Graphics Apple M5 Ultra GPU (80-core)
GPU Base Clock - 500 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2000 MHz 1620 MHz
Shading Units - 10240
TMUs - 640
ROPs - 320
Execution Units - 1280
iGPU FLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - LPDDR5X-9600
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 512 GB
Memory Channels 2 64
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 1228.8 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 285 official page -
PCI Express Version 5.0 -
PCI Express Lanes 24 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
4 (100%)
Total votes: 4

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M5 Ultra (36-Core) or Intel Core Ultra 9 285?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!