Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.5 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24-cores against the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS
35.3
(Mediocre)
Value Index
54.5
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 7900 and 285
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285
  • Newer - released 1 year and 11 months later
  • Has 12 more physical cores
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 5 nanometers
  • More than 10° C higher critical temperature
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Has 28 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (68th and 54th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
20165
17401
File compression 1380 MB/sec 1690 MB/sec
Clang compilation 221 Klines/sec 149.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 407 pages/sec 341.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 501.6 Mpixels/sec 481.5 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 356.4 pages/sec 299.8 pages/sec
Background blur 81.2 images/sec 70.3 images/sec
Photo processing 141.3 images/sec 119.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 47.2 Mpixels/sec 31 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 1146 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math - 162.4 GOps/sec
Floating point math - 97.2 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers - 378M Primes/sec
Random string sorting - 68.5M Strings/sec
Data encryption - 34.4 GBytes/sec
Data compression - 573.4 MBytes/sec
Physics - 3027 Frames/sec
Extended instructions - 41.9B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3] – 3274 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 23.2 PPW 25.5 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 310.2 PPW 267.7 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt - 739 PPW
Blender / Watt - 6.11 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
No benchmark results yet
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-03-17 (A_Nobody)Cinebench 2024120 / 1657

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285 and AMD Ryzen 9 7900

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released December 18, 2024 January 10, 2023
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 4 (Raphael)
Model number 285 -
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Rival Equivalent - - Intel Core i9 13900
Intel CPU rating (#20th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#20th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 12
P-Threads 8 24
Base Frequency (P) 2.5 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.6 GHz 5.4 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 -
E-Threads 16 -
Base Frequency (E) 1.9 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 12
Total Threads 24 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 25x 37x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No Yes

Package

Transistors - 13.1 billions
Fabrication Process 3 nm 5 nm
TDP (PL1) 65 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 182 W 142 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 AM5
Peak Temperature 105°C 95°C
Desktop CPU ranking (30th and 38th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc Graphics Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
GPU Base Clock - 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2000 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units - 128
TMUs - 8
ROPs - 4
Execution Units - 2
TGP - 15 W
iGPU FLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR5-5200
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s -
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 285 official page AMD Ryzen 9 7900 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 or Intel Core Ultra 9 285?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!