Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ultra 9 285H
62
out of 100
VS
69
out of 100
We compared two laptop CPUs: the 3.3 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 288V with 8-cores against the 2.9 GHz Ultra 9 285H with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
- Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5-8400 RAM
- Has 8 more physical cores
- Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
- More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
- 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.4 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
| Cinebench 2026 (Single) | - | 506 |
| Cinebench 2026 (Multi) | - | 4879 |
Cinebench Scores (#123rd place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1020 MB/sec | 1510 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 69 Klines/sec | 129.7 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 278.5 pages/sec | 425.7 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 290.7 Mpixels/sec | 522.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 312.1 pages/sec | 309.2 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 49.8 images/sec | 73.9 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 117 images/sec | 159.5 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 14.5 Mpixels/sec | 26.8 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 44 GOps/sec | 86 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 59.5 GOps/sec | 109.3 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 194M Primes/sec | 330M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 22.6M Strings/sec | 41M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 14.1 GBytes/sec | 26.2 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 186.1 MBytes/sec | 336.1 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 1634 Frames/sec | 2512 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 15.6B Matrices/sec | 26.8B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 17 PPW | 24.9 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 299.2 PPW | 381.6 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 534.6 PPW | 759.8 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 3.63 PPW | 4.56 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
No benchmark results yet
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-01-16 (AsNapur) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2756 / 16837 |
| π 2026-01-16 (AsNapur) | Cinebench 2024 | 122 / 1126 |
| π 2025-10-31 (Adi) | Cinebench 2024 | 114 / 804 |
| π 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2868 / 14847 |
| π 2025-08-07 (Himmanshu Chowdhury) | Cinebench 2024 | 117 / 1122 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 288V and Ultra 9 285HGeneral
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | September 4, 2024 | January 6, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Lunar Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | 288V | 285H |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics 140V | Arc Graphics 140T |
| Rival Equivalent | - | - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 |
Intel CPU rating (72nd and 46th place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 4 | 6 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 3.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| E-Cores | 4 | 10 |
| E-Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Base Frequency (E) | 3.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 3.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Total Cores | 8 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 33x | 29x |
| L1 Cache | 192K (per core) | 112K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2560K (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 24MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 17-37 W (configurable) | 35-45 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 37 W | 115 W |
| Socket | FCBGA-2833 | FCBGA-2049 |
| Peak Temperature | 100Β°C | 110Β°C |
Laptop processors ranking (83rd and 58th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Arc Graphics 140T |
| GPU Base Clock | 600 MHz | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 2350 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| TMUs | - | 64 |
| ROPs | - | 32 |
| Execution Units | - | 8 |
| TGP | 30 W | 35 W |
iGPU FLOPS
More info: Arc 140T compared to Arc 140V
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5X-8533 | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
| Max. Memory Size | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 9 288V official page | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 8 | 28 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 76