Home > CPU Comparison > Core Ultra 9 288V or Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: what's better?

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

62 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
VS
72 out of 100
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 3.3 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 288V with 8-cores against the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments (9)

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 370 and 288V
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
  • Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • More powerful AMD Radeon 890M integrated graphics: 5.9 vs 4.2 TFLOPS

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Core Ultra 9 288V
vs
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 475
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 5200
Cinebench Scores (#103rd place)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1020 MB/sec 1340 MB/sec
Clang compilation 69 Klines/sec 139.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 278.5 pages/sec 335.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 290.7 Mpixels/sec 468.2 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 312.1 pages/sec 322.1 pages/sec
Background blur 49.8 images/sec 63.8 images/sec
Photo processing 117 images/sec 124.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 14.5 Mpixels/sec 33.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 3 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 44 GOps/sec 122.2 GOps/sec
Floating point math 59.5 GOps/sec 76.4 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 194M Primes/sec 127M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 22.6M Strings/sec 48.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 14.1 GBytes/sec 22.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 186.1 MBytes/sec 442.7 MBytes/sec
Physics 1634 Frames/sec 1881 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 15.6B Matrices/sec 31.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 500 & 3074 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
Core Ultra 9 288V
134.21
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 +109%
281.07

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 17 PPW 23 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 299.2 PPW 295.9 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 534.6 PPW 647.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.63 PPW 5.21 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
No benchmark results yet
Add
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-26 (Nvdya)Cinebench 2024114 / 1135
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-24 (Peterr)Cinebench 2024117 / 962
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Rennsport)Geekbench 6 CPU2904 / 15532
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Asus Tuf FA608WI)Cinebench 2024104 / 1050
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-15 (Urxelix)Cinebench 2024116 / 1217
Add View all (6)

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 288V and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released September 4, 2024 June 3, 2024
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Lunar Lake Zen 5 (Strix Point)
Model number 288V 370
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140V Radeon 890M
Rival Equivalent - - Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Successor - - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
Intel CPU rating (#72nd place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#31st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 4
P-Threads 4 8
Base Frequency (P) 3.3 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 4 8
E-Threads 4 16
Base Frequency (E) 3.3 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.7 GHz 3.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 8 12
Total Threads 8 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 33x 20x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2560K (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 12MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 17-37 W (configurable) 15-54 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 37 W -
Socket FCBGA-2833 FP8
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (83rd and 42nd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc Graphics 140V AMD Radeon 890M
GPU Base Clock 600 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2050 MHz 2900 MHz
Shading Units 1024 1024
TMUs - 64
ROPs - 32
Execution Units - 16
TGP 30 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
Core Ultra 9 288V
4.2 TFLOPS
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 +40%
5.9 TFLOPS
More info: Radeon 890M compared to Arc 140V

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8533 - DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5X-8000
Max. Memory Size 32 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 288V official page AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 8 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
116 (23.2%)
385 (76.8%)
Total votes: 501

Competitors

1. AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (7)
2. AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2)
3. AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 (2)
4. AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Apple M4 (10-Core) (12)
5. Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
6. Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
7. Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1)
8. Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
9. Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
10. Intel Core Ultra 9 288V vs Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or Intel Core Ultra 9 288V?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Ben Dover October 6, 2024 at 06:15 PM
TFLOPS aren't the best representative for GPU performance, can you please update with 3D Mark results?
+8 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd October 25, 2024 at 11:52 AM
I like TFLOPs as a measure of GPU raw unrefined power. Efficient use of that power can be seen in the 3D Mark and real world results.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Han September 10, 2024 at 11:51 AM
This is more power-efficient than Ryzen, but Intel will add threads to maximize multi-core performance and slightly reduce single-core. Let's wait for the next rumor.
+19 Reply
Avatar
KingDStefan September 20, 2024 at 03:01 PM
INTEL copied ARM CPUs: - single thread cores - big L2 cache Also 9 288V is horrible +76% TDP for 15% performance over 7 258V (We will see 7 268V (2% over 7 258V) only in Dell & HP overpriced laptops) Cinebench 2024 Multi core: AI 9 HX 370 (35W) 1040 = 9 185H (65W) 1041 Let's say 9 288V will have same score at 33W INTEL won due to soldered ram in soc and higher speed. If AMD will release AI 9 HX X3D on 3nm, 9 288V will be irrelevant.
+14 Reply
Avatar
Barm September 20, 2024 at 04:50 PM
KingDStefan, I think you are right, Ryzen seems to be very promising. And price always lower than Intel makes it value for money.
+7 Reply
Avatar
KingDStefan September 22, 2024 at 09:42 AM
Barm, Yes, AMD has a great value. In most cases AMD 9 is cheaper than Intel 7 on same laptop.
+3 Reply
Avatar
KingDStefan September 22, 2024 at 09:56 AM
I did more searches on internet on Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core AI 9 HX 370: 9 288V: -15W: 621 -15W: 271 -20W: 760 -20W: 438 -28W: 927 -28W: 637 Also you can boost your FPS by solid 50% on 890M with Fluid Motion Frames 2
+10 Reply
Avatar
Barron September 27, 2024 at 12:08 AM
Lunar Lake is actually less power efficient than the Ryzen Zen 5 mobile.
+8 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd September 5, 2024 at 04:55 PM
It is a bit of a tradeoff, so I cannot say one is better than the other. - Intel for battery life, RAM speed, photo editing, and iGPU. Slightly better for creators and traveling consultants/sales reps. - AMD for multi-core performance and more compatibility for gaming drivers. Better for the average office worker that wants to game on the side. Also, excellent for programmers.
+18 Reply
EnglishРусский