Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.7 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus with 24-cores against the 3.1 GHz AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 495 and Plus
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.5 GHz vs 5.2 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495
  • Newer - released 7 months later
  • More powerful Radeon 8065S integrated graphics: 15.4 vs 2 TFLOPS
  • Around 153.6 GB/s (150%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • Supports quad-channel memory
  • Has 28 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 588 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 9708 -
Cinebench Scores (#8th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1660 MB/sec -
Clang compilation 217.2 Klines/sec -
HTML 5 Browser 495.3 pages/sec -
PDF Renderer 584.4 Mpixels/sec -
Text processing 342.8 pages/sec -
Background blur 84 images/sec -
Photo processing 160.2 images/sec -
Ray tracing 46.4 Mpixels/sec -
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 165.3 GOps/sec -
Floating point math 201.5 GOps/sec -
Find prime numbers 514M Primes/sec -
Random string sorting 80M Strings/sec -
Data encryption 50 GBytes/sec -
Data compression 656.5 MBytes/sec -
Physics 3361 Frames/sec -
Extended instructions 51B Matrices/sec -
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 165 samples

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 44.2 PPW -
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 392.4 PPW 193.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1077.7 PPW 468.7 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 17, 2026 September 5, 2026
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake -
Model number 290HX+ PRO 495
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 8065S
Intel CPU rating (#4th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 16
P-Threads 8 32
Base Frequency (P) 2.7 GHz 3.1 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.5 GHz 5.2 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 -
E-Threads 16 -
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.7 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 16
Total Threads 24 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 27x 31x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-55 W (configurable) 45-120 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 160 W -
Socket FCBGA-2114 FP11
Peak Temperature 105°C 100°C

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 8065S
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 1295 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2000 MHz 3000 MHz
Shading Units 512 2560
TMUs 32 160
ROPs 16 64
Execution Units 64 40
TGP 14 W 55 W
iGPU FLOPS
15.4 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - LPDDR5X-8533
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 4
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 256 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus official page AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 or Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!