Adreno X2-85 vs Adreno X1-45
VS
Adreno X2-85
Adreno X2
Adreno X1-45
Adreno X1
We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Adreno X2-85 with 12 pipelines and 2048 shaders against the 1 year and 11 months older Adreno X1-45 that utilizes 3 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Adreno X2-85
- Performs significantly better (up to 3.1x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- 3.3x higher maximum theoretical performance (7 vs 2.1 TFLOPS)
- Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
- Has 2.7x more shading units (2048 vs 768)
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 1403 | 928 |
| Solar Bay | 14961 | 5990 |
| Port Royal | 735 | - |
| Fire Strike | 7510 | 3707 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 6989 | 3225 |
| Night Raid | 24606 | 16550 |
GeekBench 6 GPU Compute
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | - | 14.2 img/sec |
| Face Detection | - | 6.82 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | - | 0.56 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | - | 0.65 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | - | 0.55 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | - | 0.12 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | - | 26.6 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | - | 1746.7 FPS |
| API | - | OpenCL |
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 655 | 349 |
| DirectX 11 | 45 FPS | 13 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 23 FPS | 10 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 2523 Ops/s | 810 Ops/s |
Recent User Tests
Adreno X2-85
No benchmark results yet
Adreno X1-45
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-03-18 (Rennsport) | GeekBench | 9564 |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Adreno X2-85 and Adreno X1-45General
| Vendor | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Released | September 25, 2025 | October 24, 2023 |
| Case | Laptop | Laptop |
| Purpose | Generic | Generic |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Adreno X2 | Adreno X1 |
| GPU Codename | Adreno X2 | Adreno X1 |
| Rival Equivalent | - Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core) | - Apple M2 GPU (8-core) |
| Recommended CPU | - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite (X2E-90-100) or above | - Qualcomm Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) or above |
| Used in CPUs | - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite (X2E-84-100) | - Qualcomm Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-42-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-46-100) |
Laptop GPU ranking (50th and 105th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 500 MHz | 280 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1350-1700 MHz (configurable) | 1107-1367 MHz (configurable) |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 768 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 128 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 64 | 24 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 12 | 3 |
| Tensor Cores | No | - |
| L1 Cache | - | 192KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | - | 1MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 86-109 GPixel/s | 27-33 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 173-218 GTexel/s | 53-66 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | IGP | IGP |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die Size | 220 mm² | - |
Memory
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Bus | 128-bit | - |
| ECC | No | - |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | - | 3.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | No | No |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1