GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop vs Apple M2 GPU (8-core)

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4 GB with 16 pipelines and 2048 shaders against the 1 year and 5 months newer Apple M2 GPU (8-core) that utilizes 128 pipelines and 1024 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version
-

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M2 GPU (8-core) over RTX 3050 Mobile
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.1x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.4x higher maximum theoretical performance (7.1 vs 2.9 TFLOPS)
  • Includes 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 2 technology
  • Achieves 2x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (58K vs 29K)
  • Has 87% higher memory bandwidth: 192 vs 102.4 GB/s
  • Has 2x more shading units (2048 vs 1024)
Reasons to consider the Apple M2 GPU (8-core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
75
44
34
21
-
The Witcher 3
68
53
38
20
-
Counter-Strike 2
115
80
54
23
-
Far Cry 6
60
52
40
17
-
Hogwarts Legacy
37
28
23
12
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
48
37
27
16
-
Ghost of Tsushima
37
28
18
10
-
Cyberpunk 2077
36
35
19
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
66
62
39
18
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 60 -
1080p Ultra 47 -
1440p Ultra 32 -
4K Ultra 16 -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 4884 -
Solar Bay 21596 7316
Port Royal 552 -
Fire Strike 12571 -
Wild Life Extreme 9400 5676
Night Raid 53685 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
58733
Background Blur 88.6 img/sec 58.7 img/sec
Face Detection 57.3 img/sec 35.2 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.53 Gpixels/sec 1.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.33 Gpixels/sec 1.82 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 2.55 Gpixels/sec 1.2 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.76 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 256.5 Gpixels/sec 96 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 7465.5 FPS 3825.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 493 -
DirectX 11 71 FPS -
DirectX 12 46 FPS -
GPU Compute 3868 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 20037 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
1154.04
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 1497 & 83 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-31 (bobschieffer)Geekbench 6 OpenCL61418
📘 2026-08-29 (bobschieffer)Cinebench 20243654
📘 2026-08-13 -> Kushagra_AggarwalSteel Nomad Light5735
📘 2026-01-26 (rar)Geekbench 6 OpenCL68364
Apple M2 GPU (8-core)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
19152
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 4349 3242
Image Segmentation (HP) 11416 4890
Image Super Resolution (Q) 8973 7149
Face Detection (HP) 18927 10340
Pose Estimation (Q) 34631 21268
Text Classification (SP) 2269 2268
Machine Translation (HP) 3539 1122
Object Detection (SP) 5046 3007
Depth Estimation (Q) 15772 13941
Style Transfer (SP) 75260 35943
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop and Apple M2 GPU (8-core)

General

Vendor Nvidia Apple
Build Discrete Integrated
Released January 1, 2021 June 6, 2022
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Professional
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Ampere Apple M GPU
GPU Codename GA107 -
Successor - GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop - Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
Recommended CPU - - Apple M2 or above
Used in CPUs - - Apple M2
Laptop GPU ranking (93rd and 90th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 712-1530 MHz (configurable) 500 MHz
Boost Clock 1057-1740 MHz (configurable) 1398 MHz
Shading Units 2048 1024
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 64 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 40 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 16 128
Tensor Cores 64 -
Ray-tracing Cores 16 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 42-70 GPixel/s 45 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 68-111 GTexel/s 89 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
4.3-7.1 TFLOPS
2.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 Custom
TGP 35-95 W (configurable) 15 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Fabrication Process 8 nm 5 nm
Die Size 200 mm² -
Transistor Count 8.7 billion 11.6 billion
Transistor Density 43.5 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 94°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Size 4 GB -
Memory Clock 1500 MHz 6400 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 12000 Mbps 12800 Mbps
Bus 128-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
102.4 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.2 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 3.0 -
CUDA 8.6 -
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS DLSS 2 No
DisplayPort 1.4a -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
45 (75%)
15 (25%)
Total votes: 60

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!