GeForce RTX 3060 vs 2070 SUPER
VS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
GA106
We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB with 28 pipelines and 3584 shaders against the 1 year and 6 months older RTX 2070 SUPER 8 GB that utilizes 40 pipelines and 2560 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Value for money (Beta)
Key differences
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3060
- Manufactured using a more efficient 8 nm process technology
- 40% higher maximum theoretical performance (12.7 vs 9.1 TFLOPS)
- Includes 4 GB more video memory
- Has 40% more shading units (3584 vs 2560)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- Performs slightly better (up to 12%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- Shows 10% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 66 vs 60 FPS
- Features 208 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
- Has 24% higher memory bandwidth: 448 vs 360 GB/s
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 112 68 60 39 |
123 74 65 44 |
| The Witcher 3 | 122 100 74 39 |
136 113 79 43 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 181 137 99 48 |
202 146 107 56 |
| Far Cry 6 | 95 85 67 37 |
103 91 73 40 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 65 57 40 18 |
74 61 46 25 |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 80 74 53 31 |
93 86 59 41 |
| Ghost of Tsushima | 62 50 37 20 |
73 58 41 26 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 68 64 38 16 |
82 72 43 22 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 109 98 70 36 |
121 114 80 41 |
| 1080p High | 99 | 112 |
| 1080p Ultra | 81 | 91 |
| 1440p Ultra | 60 | 66 |
| 4K Ultra | 32 | 38 |
| Margin of Error | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 8754 | 10166 |
| Solar Bay | 41158 | 45863 |
| Port Royal | 5145 | 6032 |
| Fire Strike | 22304 | 25679 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 17728 | 20744 |
| Night Raid | 97159 | 102662 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 149.6 img/sec | 166.7 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 91 img/sec | 103.3 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 4.07 Gpixels/sec | 4.21 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.58 Gpixels/sec | 5.56 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 3.92 Gpixels/sec | 5.58 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.01 Gpixels/sec | 1.17 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 372.9 Gpixels/sec | 489.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 12226.3 FPS | 13242.9 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 965 | 878 |
| DirectX 11 | 127 FPS | 154 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 8231 Ops/s | 7441 Ops/s |
Blender
Blender GPU
Recent User Tests
GeForce RTX 3060
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-12-07 (tach) | Cinebench 2024 | 7952 |
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
No benchmark results yet
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 6645 | 6648 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 15338 | 16442 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 14283 | 15383 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 28862 | 32861 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 61313 | 66348 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 2463 | 2166 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 3793 | 4239 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 7712 | 8194 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 25461 | 26192 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 123233 | 137642 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 3060 and 2070 SUPERGeneral
| Vendor | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Released | January 12, 2021 | July 9, 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $499 |
| Case | Desktop | Desktop |
| Purpose | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| GPU Codename | GA106 | TU104 |
| Rival Equivalent | - Radeon RX 6700 XT | - |
| Successor | - GeForce RTX 5060 | - |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core i5 12600K or above | - Intel Core i7 9700K or above |
Desktop GPU rating (58th and 57th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 1320 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 2560 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 112 | 160 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 48 | 64 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 28 | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 320 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 28 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 128KB per cluster | 64KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 3MB shared | 4MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 85 GPixel/s | 113 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 199 GTexel/s | 283 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TGP | 170 W | 215 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Die Size | 276 mm² | 545 mm² |
| Transistor Count | 12 billion | 13 billion |
| Transistor Density | 43.48 MTr/mm² | 23.85 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Clock | 1875 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed | 15000 Mbps | 14000 Mbps |
| Bus | 192-bit | 256-bit |
| ECC | No | No |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 2 | DLSS 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 112