GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop vs 2050 Mobile

We compared two discrete laptop gaming GPUs: the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB with 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 1 year and 2 months older RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB that utilizes 16 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 2050 Laptop over RTX 4050 Mobile
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 2.1x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 53 vs 25 FPS
  • 2x higher maximum theoretical performance (12.1 vs 6 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
107
66
56
35
66
38
28
18
The Witcher 3
117
91
67
34
49
40
24
14
Counter-Strike 2
167
126
88
43
87
61
41
17
Far Cry 6
87
79
59
32
48
45
34
15
Hogwarts Legacy
62
52
34
20
29
22
17
9
CoD: Modern Warfare III
75
68
44
30
37
32
21
15
Ghost of Tsushima
57
45
33
17
27
20
15
9
Cyberpunk 2077
61
57
34
13
28
24
14
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
98
90
62
32
51
50
31
15
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 92 47
1080p Ultra 75 37
1440p Ultra 53 25
4K Ultra 28 13
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 8212 3932
Solar Bay 35375 19073
Port Royal 4624 413
Fire Strike 21909 10472
Wild Life Extreme 15492 7222
Night Raid 84848 45365
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
81436
Background Blur 141.4 img/sec 73.3 img/sec
Face Detection 84.1 img/sec 39.7 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.07 Gpixels/sec 1.65 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.91 Gpixels/sec 2.13 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 3.85 Gpixels/sec 2.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.1 Gpixels/sec 0.55 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 325.9 Gpixels/sec 191.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 11008.8 FPS 5921.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 622 479
DirectX 11 129 FPS 47 FPS
DirectX 12 60 FPS 42 FPS
GPU Compute 5847 Ops/s 3507 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 14311 & 5094 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2567.25
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 2120 & 268 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-17 (kam)Geekbench 6 OpenCL93074
📘 2026-07-15 (Mr._.Flexo)Cinebench 20248096
📘 2026-07-02 (SuperDuck)Geekbench 6 OpenCL90032
📘 2026-05-18 (TheMan)Cinebench 20248523
📘 2026-05-15 -> ZayGeekbench 6 OpenCL89343
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-20 (ZB)Geekbench 6 OpenCL45651

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
27160
GB6 ML Quantized
12230
Image Classification (SP) 6233 3489
Image Segmentation (HP) 16395 7528
Image Super Resolution (Q) 18240 6509
Face Detection (HP) 30758 13217
Pose Estimation (Q) 61300 24531
Text Classification (SP) 3124 2148
Machine Translation (HP) 4357 2764
Object Detection (SP) 7812 3948
Depth Estimation (Q) 29192 13355
Style Transfer (SP) 117759 60626
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop and 2050 Mobile

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released February 22, 2023 December 17, 2021
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ampere
GPU Codename AD107 (GN21-X2) GA107
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX 7700S -
Successor - GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop -
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or above - Intel Core i5 11500H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (67th and 97th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1140-2070 MHz (configurable) 735-1185 MHz (configurable)
Boost Clock 1605-2370 MHz (configurable) 1245-1477 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 2560 2048
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 80 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 20 16
Tensor Cores 80 64
Ray-tracing Cores 20 16
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 12MB shared 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 51-76 GPixel/s 40-47 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 128-190 GTexel/s 80-95 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
8.2-12.1 TFLOPS
5.1-6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
TGP 35-140 W (configurable) 30-45 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Fabrication Process 5 nm 8 nm
Die Size 156 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor Count 18.9 billion 8 billion
Transistor Density 121.15 MTr/mm² 40 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 6 GB 4 GB
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 1750 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 14000 Mbps
Bus 96-bit 64-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
112 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 8.9 8.6
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 No
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
70 (84.3%)
13 (15.7%)
Total votes: 83

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!