GeForce RTX 5050 vs RTX 3050
VS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050
GB207-300
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
GA106
We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the GeForce RTX 5050 with 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 3 years and 5 months older RTX RTX 3050 that utilizes 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Value for money (Beta)
Key differences
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5050
- Performs significantly better (up to 58%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- Shows 60% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 67 vs 42 FPS
- Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
- 45% higher maximum theoretical performance (13.2 vs 9.1 TFLOPS)
- Supports Nvidia DLSS 4 technology
- Has 43% higher memory bandwidth: 320 vs 224 GB/s
- Achieves 38% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (92K vs 67K)
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 121 78 67 46 |
92 53 43 26 |
| The Witcher 3 | 137 110 79 42 |
90 70 49 24 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 198 146 106 55 |
139 101 72 31 |
| Far Cry 6 | 104 93 74 41 |
76 66 49 25 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 74 63 44 23 |
49 38 30 13 |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 92 84 61 39 |
59 49 35 22 |
| Ghost of Tsushima | 74 58 43 25 |
46 35 28 15 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 79 70 44 21 |
48 45 26 11 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 125 113 82 43 |
80 73 49 25 |
| 1080p High | 112 | 75 |
| 1080p Ultra | 91 | 59 |
| 1440p Ultra | 67 | 42 |
| 4K Ultra | 37 | 21 |
| Margin of Error | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 10200 | 6235 |
| Solar Bay | 47171 | 30191 |
| Port Royal | 6181 | 3546 |
| Fire Strike | 28750 | 15967 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 19017 | 12795 |
| Night Raid | 111186 | 74854 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 129.6 img/sec | 110.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 94.6 img/sec | 64.4 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.45 Gpixels/sec | 2.87 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 4.41 Gpixels/sec | 3.76 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 4.43 Gpixels/sec | 2.89 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.16 Gpixels/sec | 0.81 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 434.1 Gpixels/sec | 270.9 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 13990.8 FPS | 9339.7 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 1052 | 916 |
| DirectX 11 | 152 FPS | 90 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 8407 Ops/s | 6415 Ops/s |
Blender
Blender GPU
Recent User Tests
GeForce RTX 5050
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-25 (Sohail) | Cinebench 2024 | 34368 |
| 📘 2026-02-22 (Alex Paulino) | Cinebench 2024 | 39492 |
GeForce RTX 3050
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-21 -> DmitryDmitry | Cinebench 2024 | 4722 |
| 📘 2026-04-21 -> DmitryDmitry | Steel Nomad Light | 6237 |
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 7103 | 4958 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 22390 | 12747 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 17642 | 9816 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 40054 | 22467 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 66253 | 41362 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 3436 | 2563 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 5705 | 3721 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 8910 | 5929 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 31732 | 18361 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 107993 | 84665 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 5050 and RTX 3050General
| Vendor | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Released | June 24, 2025 | January 27, 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $249 |
| Case | Desktop | Desktop |
| Purpose | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| GPU Codename | GB207-300 | GA106 |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core Ultra 5 245K or above | - Intel Core i5 12400 or above |
Desktop GPU rating (55th and 71st place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 2317 MHz | 1552 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 80 | 80 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 32 | 32 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 20 | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 80 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 20 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 128KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 32MB shared | 2MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 82 GPixel/s | 57 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 206 GTexel/s | 142 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 130 W | 130 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Fabrication Process | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Die Size | 149 mm² | 276 mm² |
| Transistor Count | 16.9 billion | 12 billion |
| Transistor Density | 113.42 MTr/mm² | 43.48 MTr/mm² |
| Max. Temperature | 87°C | - |
Memory
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed | 20000 Mbps | 14000 Mbps |
| Bus | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| ECC | No | No |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | 12.0 | 8.6 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 4 | DLSS 2 |
| DisplayPort | 2.1b | 1.4a |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 119