Nvidia RTX Pro 3000 Laptop (Blackwell) vs 3000 Laptop (Ada)

We compared two discrete laptop professional GPUs: the Nvidia RTX Pro 3000 Mobile (Blackwell) 12 GB with 46 pipelines and 5888 shaders against the 2 years older 3000 Mobile (Ada) 8 GB that utilizes 36 pipelines and 4608 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 3000 Mobile (Ada) over RTX Pro 3000 Mobile (Blackwell)
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX Pro 3000 Laptop (Blackwell)
  • Performs better (up to 22%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 30% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 79 vs 61 FPS
  • 44% higher maximum theoretical performance (28.6 vs 19.9 TFLOPS)
  • Includes 4 GB more video memory
  • Has 2.6x higher memory bandwidth: 672 vs 256 GB/s
  • Achieves 40% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (167K vs 119K)
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 4 technology
  • Has 28% more shading units (5888 vs 4608)
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 3000 Laptop (Ada)
  • Supports error correction code (ECC) memory

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
137
87
76
56
117
73
60
41
The Witcher 3
154
130
93
50
130
103
76
39
Counter-Strike 2
224
173
126
67
187
135
101
49
Far Cry 6
121
107
88
49
97
86
69
37
Hogwarts Legacy
88
73
56
29
67
55
42
23
CoD: Modern Warfare III
111
104
74
46
85
73
53
36
Ghost of Tsushima
85
70
50
30
68
49
37
24
Cyberpunk 2077
96
86
51
24
71
66
36
17
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
146
133
100
51
113
103
73
37
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 129 104
1080p Ultra 107 83
1440p Ultra 79 61
4K Ultra 45 34
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 12518 8373
Solar Bay 66557 36647
Port Royal 10955 5210
Fire Strike 32060 20658
Wild Life Extreme - 14678
Night Raid - 51077
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 238.8 img/sec 196.1 img/sec
Face Detection 147.6 img/sec 118.9 img/sec
Horizon Detection 6.73 Gpixels/sec 4.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 9.27 Gpixels/sec 5.54 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 10.7 Gpixels/sec 6.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.68 Gpixels/sec 1.4 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 778.4 Gpixels/sec 573 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 23023.5 FPS 17661.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 826 542
DirectX 11 212 FPS 141 FPS
DirectX 12 94 FPS 79 FPS
GPU Compute 7266 Ops/s 6048 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 326 & 345 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 27 & 16 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 9790 7093
Image Segmentation (HP) 28672 14759
Image Super Resolution (Q) 26553 23321
Face Detection (HP) 53161 29211
Pose Estimation (Q) 120306 87917
Text Classification (SP) 3406 3395
Machine Translation (HP) 5910 3464
Object Detection (SP) 12573 8181
Depth Estimation (Q) 47957 30150
Style Transfer (SP) 199379 167055
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX Pro 3000 Laptop (Blackwell) and 3000 Laptop (Ada)

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released March 18, 2025 March 21, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Blackwell 2.0 Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename GB205-300-A1 AD106
Successor - - Nvidia RTX Pro 3000 Laptop (Blackwell)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 165H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (12th and 31st place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 848-1605 MHz (configurable) -
Boost Clock 1605-2430 MHz (configurable) 1165-2160 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 5888 4608
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 184 144
Render Output Units (ROPs) 80 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 46 36
Tensor Cores 184 144
Ray-tracing Cores 46 36
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 48MB shared 32MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 128-194 GPixel/s 56-104 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 295-447 GTexel/s 168-311 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
18.9-28.6 TFLOPS
10.7-19.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 60-140 W (configurable) 35-140 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 5 nm
Die Size 263 mm² 188 mm²
Transistor Count 31.1 billion 22.9 billion
Transistor Density 118.25 MTr/mm² 121.81 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature - 95°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory Size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory Clock 1750 MHz 2000 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 28000 Mbps 16000 Mbps
Bus 192-bit 128-bit
ECC No Yes
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 12 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 4 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 2.1b 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!