Nvidia RTX Pro 4000 Laptop (Blackwell) vs 4000 Laptop (Ada)

We compared two discrete laptop professional GPUs: the Nvidia RTX Pro 4000 Mobile (Blackwell) 16 GB with 60 pipelines and 7680 shaders against the 2 years older 4000 Mobile (Ada) 12 GB that utilizes 58 pipelines and 7424 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4000 Mobile (Ada) over RTX Pro 4000 Mobile (Blackwell)
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX Pro 4000 Laptop (Blackwell)
  • Performs better (up to 30%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 15% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 114 vs 99 FPS
  • Includes 4 GB more video memory
  • Has 2.1x higher memory bandwidth: 896 vs 432 GB/s
  • Achieves 42% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (197K vs 139K)
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 4 technology
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 4000 Laptop (Ada)
  • 17% higher maximum theoretical performance (33.6 vs 28.8 TFLOPS)
  • Supports error correction code (ECC) memory

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
180
121
112
83
159
108
95
69
The Witcher 3
197
167
122
66
180
155
112
58
Counter-Strike 2
275
213
152
84
262
205
144
80
Far Cry 6
148
136
117
72
140
128
106
64
Hogwarts Legacy
122
100
82
45
110
92
71
36
CoD: Modern Warfare III
164
150
118
78
137
128
96
65
Ghost of Tsushima
110
93
77
48
97
82
66
38
Cyberpunk 2077
140
127
85
38
120
109
71
30
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
229
213
159
85
190
174
132
71
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 174 155
1080p Ultra 147 131
1440p Ultra 114 99
4K Ultra 67 57
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 16906 15498
Solar Bay 49611 67951
Port Royal 12094 10118
Fire Strike 31680 36295
Night Raid 131505 130940
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 267.1 img/sec 187.1 img/sec
Face Detection 165.5 img/sec 139.5 img/sec
Horizon Detection 8.72 Gpixels/sec 5.71 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 12.3 Gpixels/sec 8.53 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 12.6 Gpixels/sec 8.38 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.83 Gpixels/sec 1.55 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 942.6 Gpixels/sec 577.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 25637.1 FPS 16849 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G2D Mark 872 714
DirectX 11 225 FPS 214 FPS
DirectX 12 108 FPS 96 FPS
GPU Compute 7943 Ops/s 8532 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 235 & 458 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 24 & 59 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 11723 8658
Image Segmentation (HP) 32142 17759
Image Super Resolution (Q) 30735 28281
Face Detection (HP) 58722 37971
Pose Estimation (Q) 129551 113009
Text Classification (SP) 3539 3535
Machine Translation (HP) 6242 4038
Object Detection (SP) 14495 11288
Depth Estimation (Q) 50690 38963
Style Transfer (SP) 231154 236141
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX Pro 4000 Laptop (Blackwell) and 4000 Laptop (Ada)

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released March 18, 2025 March 21, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment High-end High-end
Architecture Blackwell 2.0 Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename GB203-300-A1 AD104
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX or above - Intel Core Ultra 9 185H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (5th and 12th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 975-1702 MHz (configurable) -
Boost Clock 1702-1875 MHz (configurable) 1465-2260 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 7680 7424
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 240 232
Render Output Units (ROPs) 96 80
Compute Units (Pipelines) 60 58
Tensor Cores 240 232
Ray-tracing Cores 60 58
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 64MB shared 48MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 163-180 GPixel/s 117-181 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 408-450 GTexel/s 340-524 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
21.8-33.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 80-175 W (configurable) 60-175 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 5 nm
Die Size 378 mm² 294 mm²
Transistor Count 45.6 billion 35.8 billion
Transistor Density 120.63 MTr/mm² 121.77 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature - 95°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory Size 16 GB 12 GB
Memory Clock 1750 MHz 2250 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 28000 Mbps 18000 Mbps
Bus 256-bit 192-bit
ECC No Yes
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 12 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 4 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 2.1b 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!