Radeon 860M vs Radeon 840M

VS
AMD Radeon 860M
Krackan Point
AMD Radeon 840M
Krackan Point

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 860M with 8 pipelines and 512 shaders against the Radeon 840M that utilizes 4 pipelines and 256 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Radeon 840M over Radeon 860M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 860M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 66%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.1x higher maximum theoretical performance (3.1 vs 1.5 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 63% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (22K vs 14K)
  • Has 2x more shading units (512 vs 256)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
41
24
20
11
25
14
12
-
The Witcher 3
19
18
11
-
11
12
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
39
26
19
9
27
20
14
-
Far Cry 6
31
26
16
9
21
17
12
-
Hogwarts Legacy
16
12
10
-
11
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
28
27
17
12
22
19
14
9
Ghost of Tsushima
16
12
9
-
13
10
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
19
13
-
-
10
10
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
29
22
15
-
16
18
11
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 26 17
1080p Ultra 20 14
1440p Ultra 14 10
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
2191
Time Spy 2604 1699
Solar Bay 11094 6960
Port Royal 1046 553
Fire Strike 6772 5303
Wild Life Extreme 5124 2671
Night Raid 29064 22563
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
22911
14025
Background Blur 57.2 img/sec 31.8 img/sec
Face Detection 30.5 img/sec 16.8 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.83 Gpixels/sec 0.46 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.16 Gpixels/sec 0.58 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.93 Gpixels/sec 0.42 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 97.8 Gpixels/sec 52.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 3933.5 FPS 2048.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
4869
G2D Mark 920 870
DirectX 11 37 FPS 32 FPS
DirectX 12 25 FPS 17 FPS
GPU Compute 2437 Ops/s 1697 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2351 & 1020 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
198.49
120.67
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 33 & 12 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 860M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-17 (flauzwerfer)Geekbench 6 OpenCL24017
📘 2026-08-17 (flauzwerfer)Steel Nomad Light2476
📘 2026-07-04 -> Starjack36Geekbench 6 OpenCL24971
Radeon 840M
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
6947
GB6 ML Half Precision
10338
GB6 ML Quantized
5334
Image Classification (SP) 2022 1988
Image Segmentation (HP) 3987 2184
Image Super Resolution (Q) 6657 4788
Face Detection (HP) 10337 6857
Pose Estimation (Q) 28437 17396
Text Classification (SP) 2326 1628
Machine Translation (HP) 4011 2053
Object Detection (SP) 1995 1825
Depth Estimation (Q) 12031 8471
Style Transfer (SP) 56710 31032
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 860M and Radeon 840M

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 7, 2025 January 7, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.5 RDNA 3.5
GPU Codename Krackan Point Krackan Point
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 140T - Intel Arc 130T
Successor - Radeon 8040S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 or above - AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 430
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 445
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 435
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 440
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
Laptop GPU ranking (101st and 108th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 600 MHz 400 MHz
Boost Clock 3000 MHz 2900 MHz
Shading Units 512 256
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 32 16
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 8
Compute Units (Pipelines) 8 4
Tensor Cores No No
Ray-tracing Cores 8 4
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 1MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 48 GPixel/s 23 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 96 GTexel/s 46 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
Radeon 860M +107%
3.1 TFLOPS
1.5 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 4 nm
Die Size 233 mm² 195 mm²
Transistor Count 34 billion -
Transistor Density 145.92 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 2.1
CUDA No No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
19 (86.4%)
3 (13.6%)
Total votes: 22

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!