Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs Acer Nitro V 16 AMD (ANV16-41)

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 and Acer Nitro V 16 AMD (ANV16-41) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
31.6
(Mediocre)
Value Index
31.7
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608
  • Easier to carry: weighs 300 grams less (around 0.66 lbs)
  • Can run popular games at about 67-92% higher FPS
  • Higher number of cutting-edge USB Type-C ports: 2 versus 1
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Features a much bigger (~53%) battery – 90 against 59 watt-hours
  • Thinner bezels and 6% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Around 21% better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • Better webcam recording quality
Advantages of the Acer Nitro V 16 AMD (ANV16-41)
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 165 versus 144 Hz

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 2.2 kg (4.85 lbs) 2.5 kg (5.51 lbs)
Dimensions 354 x 269 x 17.9-25.7 mm
13.94 x 10.59 x 0.7-1.01 inches
361.24 x 278.4 x 24.74 mm
14.22 x 10.96 x 0.97 inches
Area 952 cm2 (147.6 inches2) 1006 cm2 (155.9 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~77.9% ~73.8%
Side bezels 4.7 mm 8.3 mm
Colors Gray Black
Material Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Plastic
Transformer No No
Opening angle 180° 145°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No Yes
Number of fans 2 2
Noise level (max. load) 39.4 dB 52 dB

Display

Size 16 inches 16 inches
Type IPS LCD TN LCD
Refresh rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
PPI 142 ppi 142 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Resolution 1920 x 1200 pixels 1920 x 1200 pixels
HDR support No No
Sync technology G-Sync G-Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor No No
Display tests
Contrast 1157:1 947:1
sRGB color space 59.7% 100%
Adobe RGB profile 41.1% 39.6%
DCI-P3 color gamut 39.8% 38.3%
Response time 11 ms 7 ms
Max. brightness

Battery

Capacity
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes, 100 W Yes
Charging port position Left Left
Charge power 240 W 135 W
Weight of AC adapter 748 grams 476 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 3.8 GHz 4.3 GHz
Turbo frequency 5.1 GHz 5 GHz
Cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
L3 Cache 16 MB 16 MB
Integrated GPU Radeon 780M Radeon 760M
Fabrication process 4 nm 4 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 115 W 70 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX Yes, Advanced Optimus
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 5 nm 8 nm
GPU base clock - 1403 MHz
GPU boost clock - 1635 MHz
FLOPS 14.9 TFLOPS 6.7 TFLOPS
Memory size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 128 bit
Memory speed ~24 Gbps 12 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 2560 2048
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 80 64
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 32 40
GPU performance 14.9 TFLOPS 6.7 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Blender GPU 2984 1241
Solar Bay 44101 21684
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x4 GB 1x8 GB
Clock 5200 MHz 5600 MHz
Type DDR5 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
Max. ram size 64 GB 32 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x512 GB 1x512 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Audio chip - Realtek ALC245
Speakers 2.0 2.0
Power 2x2W 2x2W
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Loudness ~79.8 dB ~82 dB
Microphones 2 3

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6E v6
Bluetooth v5.3 v5.2
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor No No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720
Ports
USB-A 2x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 4.0 1x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt No No
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes Yes
SD card reader No Yes
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.7 mm 1.4 mm
Touchpad
Size 13.0 x 8.5 cm 12.6 x 8.2 cm
Surface Plastic Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
Further details
Notes on TUF Gaming A16 FA608:
    - The second SSD slot is limited to PCIe Gen 4x2.
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
2 (50%)
2 (50%)
Total votes: 4

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Acer Nitro V 16 AMD (ANV16-41) and Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!