Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 vs Gaming A14 FA401

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
2560 x 1600
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 and Gaming A14 FA401 important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
31.6
(Mediocre)
Value Index
38.2
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608
  • Performs significantly better (up to 86%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Can run popular games at about 45-62% higher FPS
  • Features a bigger (~23%) battery – 90 against 73 watt-hours
  • Around 7% better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • User-upgradable RAM (up to 64GB)
Advantages of the Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 165 versus 144 Hz
  • Significantly easier to carry: weighs 740 grams less (around 1.63 lbs)
  • Thinner bezels and 3% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • 52% sharper screen – 216 versus 142 pixels per inch (PPI)
  • Much smaller footprint: 26% more compact case (109.4 vs 147.6 square inches)
  • Provides 33% higher max. screen brightness: 400 vs 300 nits

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 2.2 kg (4.85 lbs) 1.46 kg (3.22 lbs)
Dimensions 354 x 269 x 17.9-25.7 mm
13.94 x 10.59 x 0.7-1.01 inches
311 x 227 x 16.9-19.9 mm
12.24 x 8.94 x 0.67-0.78 inches
Area 952 cm2 (147.6 inches2) 706 cm2 (109.4 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~77.9% ~80.5%
Side bezels 4.7 mm 4.8 mm
Colors Gray Gray
Material Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Transformer No No
Opening angle 180° -
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 2 2
Noise level (max. load) 39.4 dB -

Display

Size 16 inches 14 inches
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Refresh rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
PPI 142 ppi 216 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Resolution 1920 x 1200 pixels 2560 x 1600 pixels
HDR support No No
Sync technology G-Sync G-Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor No No
Screen space comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608
16″ (16:10 ratio) = 115.1 in2
TUF Gaming A14 FA401
14″ (16:10 ratio) = 88.1 in2
~30% more screen space
Display tests
Contrast 1157:1 -
sRGB color space 59.7% 100%
Adobe RGB profile 41.1% -
DCI-P3 color gamut 39.8% -
Response time 11 ms 3 ms
Max. brightness

Battery

Capacity
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes, 100 W Yes, 100 W
Charging port position Left Left
Charge power 240 W 100 / 200 W
Weight of AC adapter 748 grams -

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo frequency 5.1 GHz 5.1 GHz
Cores 8 8
Threads 16 16
L3 Cache 16 MB 16 MB
Integrated GPU Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Fabrication process 4 nm 4 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 115 W -
Nvidia Optimus MUX MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 5 nm 5 nm
FLOPS 14.9 TFLOPS 8.2-12.1 TFLOPS
Memory size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 96 bit
Memory speed ~24 Gbps ~16 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 2560 2560
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 80 80
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 32 32
GPU performance 14.9 TFLOPS 8.2-12.1 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Blender GPU 2984 1827
Solar Bay 44101 26490
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x4 GB 2x4 GB
Clock 5200 MHz 8533 MHz
Type DDR5 LPDDR5X
Upgradable Yes No
Total slots 2 -
Max. ram size 64 GB -

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x512 GB 1x512 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 2.0
Power 2x2W 2x2W
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Loudness ~79.8 dB -
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6E v6E
Bluetooth v5.3 v5.4
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor No Yes
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Ports
USB-A 2x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 4.0 2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt No No
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes No
SD card reader No Yes
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes No
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.7 mm 1.7 mm
Touchpad
Size 13.0 x 8.5 cm -
Surface Plastic Glass
Windows Precision Yes Yes
Further details
Notes on TUF Gaming A16 FA608:
    - The second SSD slot is limited to PCIe Gen 4x2.
Notes on TUF Gaming A14 FA401:
    - The second SSD slot is limited to PCIe Gen 4x2.
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
12 (46.2%)
14 (53.8%)
Total votes: 26

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 and Gaming A16 FA608 or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!