MSI Katana 15 (2023) vs Asus TUF Gaming F17 (2023)

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display 1920 x 1080
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of MSI Katana 15 (2023) and Asus TUF Gaming F17 (2023) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
27.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
24.3
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the MSI Katana 15 (2023)
  • Easier to carry: weighs 350 grams less (around 0.77 lbs)
  • Includes an old-school USB-A port
  • Smaller footprint: 11% more compact case (144.1 vs 161.2 square inches)
Advantages of the Asus TUF Gaming F17 (2023)
  • Higher number of cutting-edge USB Type-C ports: 2 versus 1
  • Can run popular games at about 55-75% higher FPS
  • Around 81% better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • Performs significantly better (up to 75%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Features a much bigger (~68%) battery – 90 against 53.5 watt-hours
  • Thinner bezels and 10% higher screen-to-body ratio

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 2.25 kg (4.96 lbs) 2.6 kg (5.73 lbs)
Dimensions 359 x 259 x 24.9 mm
14.13 x 10.2 x 0.98 inches
394 x 264 x 22.9-25.4 mm
15.51 x 10.39 x 0.9-1 inches
Area 930 cm2 (144.1 inches2) 1040 cm2 (161.1 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~72.2% ~79.3%
Side bezels 6.8 mm 5.5 mm
Colors Black Gray
Material Plastic Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Transformer No No
Opening angle 180° 145°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 2 2
Noise level (max. load) 54.4 dB -

Display

Size 15.6 inches 17.3 inches
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
PPI 141 ppi 127 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:9 16:9
Resolution 1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels
HDR support No No
Sync technology No G-Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor No No
Screen space comparison
TUF Gaming F17 (2023)
17.3″ (16:9 ratio) = 127.9 in2
Katana 15 (2023)
15.6″ (16:9 ratio) = 104 in2
~22% more screen space
Display tests
Contrast 1374:1 -
sRGB color space 56.8% 62.5%
Adobe RGB profile 39.3% 47.3%
DCI-P3 color gamut 38.1% 100%
Response time 33 ms 7 ms
Max. brightness

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time 2:00 hr 1:45 hr
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) No Yes
Charging port position Left Left
Charge power 180 / 200 / 240 W 240 / 280 W
Weight of AC adapter 573 grams 735 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 2 GHz 2.3 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.4 GHz 4.7 GHz
Cores 8 (4P + 4E) 14 (6P + 8E)
Threads 12 20
L3 Cache 12 MB 24 MB
Integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics (48EU) Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)
Fabrication process 10 nm 10 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 75 W 140 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 8 nm 5 nm
GPU base clock 1403 MHz 2070 MHz
GPU boost clock 1635 MHz 2370 MHz
FLOPS 6.7 TFLOPS 13.4 TFLOPS
Memory size 6 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 96 bit
Memory speed 12 Gbps ~16 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 2048 2560
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 64 80
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 40 32
GPU performance 6.7 TFLOPS 13.4 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Blender GPU 1203 2917
Solar Bay 21206 37863
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 1x8 GB 2x4 GB
Clock 5200 MHz 4800 MHz
Type DDR5 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
Max. ram size 64 GB 32 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x512 GB 1x512 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 2.0
Power 2x2W -
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Loudness ~75.6 dB -
Microphones - 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6 v6
Bluetooth v5.2 v5.3
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor No No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1280 x 720 1280 x 720
Ports
USB-A 3x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 1x USB 3.2 2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt No Thunderbolt 4
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes Yes
SD card reader No No
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.7 mm 1.7 mm
Touchpad
Surface Plastic Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
Further details
Notes on TUF Gaming F17 (2023):
    - The model with a Core i7 12700H processor equipped with slower memory – DDR4 at 3200 MHz.
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
2 (33.3%)
4 (66.7%)
Total votes: 6

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Asus TUF Gaming F17 (2023) and MSI Katana 15 (2023) or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!