Razer Blade 16 (2025) vs HP Omen Max 16

62 out of 100
Razer Blade 16 (2025)
VS
59 out of 100
HP Omen Max 16
Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Razer Blade 16 (2025) and HP Omen Max 16 important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
20.2
(Mediocre)
Value Index
22.6
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Razer Blade 16 (2025)
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 240 versus 165 Hz
  • Significantly easier to carry: weighs 380 grams less (around 0.84 lbs)
  • Can run popular games at about 50-68% higher FPS
  • Includes an old-school USB-A port
  • Thinner bezels and 6% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Performs better (up to 28%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Features a a little bigger (~8%) battery – 90 against 83 watt-hours
  • 33% sharper screen – 189 versus 142 pixels per inch (PPI)
Advantages of the HP Omen Max 16
  • Around 2.1x better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • User-upgradable RAM (up to 64GB)

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 2.1 kg (4.63 lbs) 2.48 kg (5.47 lbs)
Dimensions 359.8 x 250.5 x 14.9-17.4 mm
14.17 x 9.86 x 0.59-0.69 inches
356.62 x 268.99 x 22.86-27.69 mm
14.04 x 10.59 x 0.9-1.09 inches
Area 901 cm2 (139.7 inches2) 959 cm2 (148.7 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~82.4% ~77.4%
Side bezels 7.6 mm 6 mm
Colors Black Black
Material Aluminum Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Aluminum
Transformer No No
Opening angle 135° 140°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber Yes Yes
Liquid metal No Yes
Number of fans 2 2
Max. fan speed (RPM) 5300 RPM -
Noise level (max. load) 53.4 dB 61.1 dB

Display

Size 16 inches 16 inches
Type OLED IPS LCD
Refresh rate 240 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (60-165 Hz)
PPI 189 ppi 142 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Resolution 2560 x 1600 pixels 1920 x 1200 pixels
HDR support Yes, HDR10 No
Sync technology Adaptive Sync G-Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor - No
Display tests
Contrast 1000000:1 -
sRGB color space 100% 100%
Adobe RGB profile 97.8% -
DCI-P3 color gamut 100% -
Response time 1 ms 3 ms
Max. brightness
400 nits
400 nits

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time 2:55 hr -
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes, 100 W Yes
Charging port position Left, Right Left, Bottom
Charge power 280 W 280 / 330 W
Weight of AC adapter 795 grams 933 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 2.0 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo frequency 5 GHz 5.2 GHz
Cores 8 (4P + 4E) 20 (8P + 12E)
Threads 16 20
L3 Cache 16 MB 30 MB
Integrated GPU Radeon 860M Arc Graphics (4-Cores)
Fabrication process 4 nm 3 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
19492
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
Omen Max 16 +111%
1925

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 115 W -
Nvidia Optimus MUX MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 4 nm 4 nm
FLOPS 18.4 TFLOPS 9.7-16.6 TFLOPS
Memory size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR7 GDDR7
Memory bus 128 bit 128 bit
Memory speed ~24 Gbps ~24 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 3328 3328
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 104 104
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 48 48
GPU performance 18.4 TFLOPS 9.7-16.6 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
12365
Blender GPU 3595 2715
Solar Bay 51855 40583
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x8 GB 2x8 GB
Clock 8000 MHz 6400 MHz
Type LPDDR5X DDR5
Upgradable No Yes
Total slots - 2
Max. ram size - 64 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 5.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x1024 GB 1x1024 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.2 (4 tweeters and 2 woofers) 2.0
Power - 2x2W
Dolby Atmos No No
Loudness ~82.1 dB ~77.9 dB
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v7 v7
Bluetooth v5.4 v5.4
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor Yes Optional
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Ports
USB-A 3x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 4.0 2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 4 Thunderbolt 4
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) No Yes
SD card reader Yes No
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Monolith
Numpad No Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.5 mm 1.5 mm
Touchpad
Size 15.0 x 9.7 cm 12.5 x 8.0 cm
Surface Glass Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
3 (27.3%)
8 (72.7%)
Total votes: 11

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of HP Omen Max 16 and Razer Blade 16 (2025) or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!