Google Pixel Fold vs Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 7.6-inch Google Pixel Fold (with Google Tensor G2) that was released on May 10, 2023, against the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, which is powered by Google Tensor G4 and came out 1 year and 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel Fold
- Better grip in hands – the body is 10.5 mm narrower
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 63% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1401K versus 859K)
- Delivers 69% higher peak brightness (2068 against 1225 nits)
- Shows 18% longer battery life (19:45 vs 16:41 hours)
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Has a 0.4 inch larger screen size
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Thinner bezels – 5.9% more screen real estate
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 30W)
- The phone is 1 year and 3 months newer
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | OLED |
| Size | 7.6 inches | 8 inches |
| Resolution | 1840 x 2208 pixels | 2076 x 2152 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 6:5 | 1:1 |
| PPI | 378 ppi | 373 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 2700 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1450 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 88.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 98.8% | 98.5% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time | 4 ms | 4 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
Pixel 9 Pro Fold
8″ (1:1 ratio) = 32 in2
Pixel Fold
7.6″ (6:5 ratio) = 28.4 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 158.7 mm (6.25 inches) | 155.2 mm (6.11 inches) |
| Width | 139.7 mm (5.5 inches) | 150.2 mm (5.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.8 mm (0.23 inches) | 5.1 mm (0.2 inches) |
| Weight | 283 g (9.98 oz) | 257 g (9.07 oz) |
| Waterproof | IPX8 | IPX8 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Gray | White, Black |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor G2 | Google Tensor G4 |
| Max clock | 2850 MHz | 3100 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.35 GHz: Cortex-A78 - 2 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X1 |
- 4 cores at 1.92 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.1 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 5 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G710 MP7 | Mali-G715 MC7 |
| GPU shading units | 448 | 896 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~759.8 GFLOPS | ~1684.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| Single-core score | 1501 | 2048 |
| Multi-core score | 3833 | 4910 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 317251 | 476883 |
| GPU | 124800 | 385522 |
| Memory | 174433 | 203655 |
| UX | 243381 | 335261 |
| Total score | 859865 | 1401321 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 80% | 84% |
| Graphics test | 5 FPS | 8 FPS |
| Graphics score | 673 | 1049 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 9317 | 10521 |
| Video editing | 6944 | 7569 |
| Photo editing | 20248 | 21074 |
| Data manipulation | 10994 | 14718 |
| Writing score | 15214 | 15880 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 17) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 17) |
| ROM | - | Stock Android |
| OS size | 15 GB | 27 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 7 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4821 mAh | 4650 mAh |
| Max charge power | 30 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (20 W) | Yes (7.5 W) |
| Reverse charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 31 min) | Yes (46% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:32 hr | 1:36 hr |
| Web browsing | 06:15 hr | 08:24 hr |
| Watching video | 10:45 hr | 12:56 hr |
| Gaming | 04:29 hr | 05:05 hr |
| Standby | 80 hr | 85 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 megapixels | 48 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 8000 x 6000 |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 121° | 127° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 48 MP 2) Telephoto: 10.8 MP 3) Ultrawide: 10.8 MP |
1) Standard: 48 MP 2) Telephoto: 10.8 MP 3) Ultrawide: 10.5 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX787 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) | 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 10.8 MP | 10.8 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.1 | f/3.1 |
| Focal length | 112 mm | 112 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) | 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 10.8 MP | 10.5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX386 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3" (≈ 0.33 inch) | 1/3.4" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.25 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 60 | 55 |
| Preview | 63 | 77 |
| Zoom | 117 | 124 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Google Pixel Fold from DxOMark | Photo samples of Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Additional lens | 9.5 MP, f/24 | - |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | - |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | - |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May 2023 | August 2024 |
| Release date | June 2023 | September 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1799 | $1799 |
| Successor | - Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold | - Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 16