Honor 400 Pro vs Honor 200
80
out of 100
VS
67
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.7-inch Honor 400 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on May 22, 2025, against the Honor 200, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 1 year before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Honor 400 Pro
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2243K versus 1002K)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- The phone is 1 year newer
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- 84% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2109 and 1147 points
Reasons to consider the Honor 200
- Weighs 18 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels | 1200 x 2664 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.98:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 436 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1500 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 4000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 90% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 160.8 mm (6.33 inches) | 161.5 mm (6.36 inches) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 inches) | 74.6 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) | 7.7 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | No |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue | White, Green, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.61/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Excellent (A) · 270 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3000 MHz | 2630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715) - 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 720 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 903-1000 MHz | 975 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS | ~998.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 14352 | 3581 |
| Single-core score | 2109 | 1147 |
| Multi-core score | 6695 | 3214 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 702885 | 364727 |
| GPU | 723128 | 228932 |
| Memory | 332058 | 164585 |
| UX | 485733 | 244236 |
| Total score | 2243804 | 1002480 |
| Samples | [24 tests] | [36 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 75% | - |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1492 | 525 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 32 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 29 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 7535 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17920 | - |
| Video editing | 7685 | - |
| Photo editing | 29553 | - |
| Data manipulation | 14371 | - |
| Writing score | 17125 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#199th place)
Recent User Tests
Honor 400 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Lunka) | AnTuTu | 2094129 |
| 📘 2026-09-01 (Maska) | AnTuTu | 2163688 |
| 📘 2026-07-07 -> naufall | AnTuTu | 2162598 |
| 📘 2026-06-28 (f0NES1k) | AnTuTu | 2306681 |
| 📘 2026-06-10 (Zhan) | AnTuTu | 2206753 |
Honor 200
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-02 (Ryno) | AnTuTu | 997900 |
| 📘 2026-06-30 (Empire) | AnTuTu | 1094330 |
| 📘 2026-04-26 (Seitekx) | AnTuTu | 987155 |
| 📘 2026-04-20 (Pro100Goose) | AnTuTu | 1019297 |
| 📘 2026-04-04 -> Alexx | AnTuTu | 1005948 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | - | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | MagicOS 10 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS updates | 6 years | 2 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5300 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (93% in 30 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:38 hr | 0:45 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 10:11 hr | - |
| Watching video | 14:23 hr | - |
| Gaming | 06:01 hr | - |
| Standby | 118 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16384 x 12288 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 2.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Angle of widest lens | 112° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP 4) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Sony IMX906 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 68 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX856 | Sony IMX856 |
| Sensor size | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) | 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 65 |
| Preview | - | 61 |
| Zoom | - | 124 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Honor 200 from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.1 |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May 2025 | May 2024 |
| Release date | May 2025 | May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $499 |
| Successor | - Honor 500 Pro | - Honor 500 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor 400 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 56
Related comparisons
2.
Honor 200 vs Honor 400 (4)
4.
Honor 200 vs Honor 200 Pro (2)