Honor Turbo vs Honor 200
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.79-inch Honor Turbo (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4) that was released on August 20, 2026, against the Honor 200, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 2 years and 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Honor Turbo
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Comes with 3360 mAh larger battery capacity: 8560 vs 5200 mAh
- The phone is 2 years and 3 months newer
Reasons to consider the Honor 200
- The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.79 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2640 pixels | 1200 x 2664 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.85:9 | 19.98:9 |
| PPI | 427 ppi | 436 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 6000 nits | 4000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 90% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 161.9 mm (6.37 inches) | 161.5 mm (6.36 inches) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 inches) | 74.6 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.76 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.7 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | No |
| Rear material | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Gold, Green | White, Green, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 2300 MHz | 2630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.3 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715) - 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715) |
| L3 cache | - | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 810 | Adreno 720 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 975 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~588.8 GFLOPS | ~998.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 3581 |
| Single-core score | 1075 | 1147 |
| Multi-core score | 3153 | 3214 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 360219 | 364727 |
| GPU | 162417 | 228932 |
| Memory | 220604 | 164585 |
| UX | 256967 | 244236 |
| Total score | 1000207 | 1002480 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [36 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 4 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 525 |
Recent User Tests
Honor Turbo
No benchmark results yet
Honor 200
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-07-02 (Ryno) | AnTuTu | 997900 |
| π 2026-06-30 (Empire) | AnTuTu | 1094330 |
| π 2026-04-26 (Seitekx) | AnTuTu | 987155 |
| π 2026-04-20 (Pro100Goose) | AnTuTu | 1019297 |
| π 2026-04-04 -> Alexx | AnTuTu | 1005948 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | - | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | MagicOS 10 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS updates | - | 2 years |
| Security updates | - | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 8560 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 0:45 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2.5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 112Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 5 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX906 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX856 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.51" (β 0.4 inch) |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 5 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 65 |
| Preview | - | 61 |
| Zoom | - | 124 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Honor 200 from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3456 x 4608 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.1 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | August 2026 | May 2024 |
| Release date | August 2026 | May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $499 |
| Successor | - | - Honor 500 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 0 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display, battery life, and design are more important to you, then choose the Honor Turbo. But if the gaming and connectivity are more of a priority β go for the Honor 200.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 4
Related comparisons
8.
Honor 200 vs Honor 200 Pro (2)
9.
Honor 200 vs Honor 400 (4)