Motorola Razr 60 vs Razr (2026)
59
out of 100
VS
66
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.9-inch Motorola Razr 60 (with MediaTek Dimensity 7400X) that was released on April 24, 2025, against the Motorola Razr (2026), which is powered by the same chip and came out 1 year and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Shows 41% longer battery life (21:56 vs 15:31 hours)
- Delivers 83% higher peak brightness (2181 against 1189 nits)
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5
- 17% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1036K versus 886K)
- The phone is 1 year and 1 month newer
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
- 37% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1069 and 783 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | POLED | POLED |
| Size | 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels | 1080 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 22:9 | 22:9 |
| PPI | 413 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3000 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 85% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 171.3 mm (6.74 inches) | 171.3 mm (6.74 inches) |
| Width | 73.99 mm (2.91 inches) | 73.99 mm (2.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.25 mm (0.29 inches) | 7.25 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP48 | IP48 |
| Rear material | Eco-leather | Eco-leather |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | White, Gray, Green, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Good (3.63/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Average (D) · 70 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X |
| Max clock | 2600 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 655 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~665.6 GFLOPS | ~665.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 3185 | 3233 |
| Single-core score | 783 | 1069 |
| Multi-core score | 2559 | 3349 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 343634 | 335634 |
| GPU | 156189 | 157888 |
| Memory | 134537 | 242451 |
| UX | 252317 | 300058 |
| Total score | 886677 | 1036031 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 409 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 19413 | - |
| Video editing | 8033 | - |
| Photo editing | 32900 | - |
| Data manipulation | 10903 | - |
| Writing score | 19391 | - |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | Hello UI | - |
| OS updates | 3 years | - |
| Security updates | 4 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 4500 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Max charge power | 30 W | 30 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (61% in 30 min) | Yes (63% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:55 hr | 0:53 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 07:02 hr | 11:40 hr |
| Watching video | 11:44 hr | 13:37 hr |
| Gaming | 04:09 hr | 05:47 hr |
| Standby | 55 hr | 79 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 122° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL GN8 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX258 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.28 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV32B | OmniVision OV32B |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) | 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | April 2025 | April 2026 |
| Release date | April 2025 | May 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | - |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Razr 60:
- There is a version with two physical SIM cards and no eSIM.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Razr (2026) is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1