Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Motorola Razr (2026)

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (with Exynos 2400) that was released on July 9, 2025, against the Motorola Razr (2026), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7400X and came out 10 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
  • 78% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1841K versus 1036K)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • 2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2085 and 1069 points
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr (2026)
  • Shows 32% longer battery life (21:56 vs 16:34 hours)
  • Delivers 52% higher peak brightness (2181 against 1437 nits)
  • Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 4800 vs 4000 mAh
  • The phone is 10 months newer

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Motorola Razr (2026) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED POLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2640 pixels 1080 x 2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 22:9 22:9
PPI 426 ppi 413 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 2600 nits 3000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate - 300 Hz
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Gorilla Glass Victus
Screen-to-body ratio 85.4% 85%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Peak brightness test (auto)
1437 nits
2181 nits

Design and build

Height 165.1 mm (6.5 inches) 171.3 mm (6.74 inches)
Width 71.9 mm (2.83 inches) 73.99 mm (2.91 inches)
Thickness 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) 7.25 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 188 g (6.63 oz)
Waterproof IP48 IP48
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Eco-leather
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black White, Gray, Green, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Repairability Average (2.95/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 210 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Motorola Razr (2026)
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 2400 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
Max clock 3200 MHz 2600 MHz
CPU cores 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 655
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 940 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU shading units 768 256
GPU clock 1095 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS ~665.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Motorola Razr (2026)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
15403
Compute Score (GPU) 15403 3233
Single-core score 2085 1069
Multi-core score 6507 3349
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1841283
1036031
CPU 558771 335634
GPU 377597 157888
Memory 404155 242451
UX 500760 300058
Total score 1841283 1036031
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM One UI 8.0 -
OS size 29.5 GB -
OS updates 7 years -
Security updates 7 years -

Battery

Capacity 4000 mAh 4800 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 30 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (54% in 30 min) Yes (63% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:29 hr 0:53 hr
Battery cycles 1700 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:11 hr 11:40 hr
Watching video 13:16 hr 13:37 hr
Gaming 04:15 hr 05:47 hr
Standby 67 hr 79 hr
General battery life
21:56 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens 123° 122°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL GN3 -
Sensor size 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 13 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL 3LU -
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.28 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 10 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 23 mm 25 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL 3J1 OmniVision OV32B
Sensor size 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced July 2025 April 2026
Release date July 2025 May 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $899 -
SAR (head) 0.84 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.54 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE. But if the battery life and design are more of a priority – go for the Motorola Razr (2026).

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!