Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Honor X9d
94
out of 100
VS
71
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.78-inch Oppo Find X9 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 16, 2025, against the Honor X9d, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Pro
- 3.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3508K versus 977K)
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 66W)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor X9d
- Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 8300 vs 7500 mAh
- Weighs 31 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.79 inches |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels | 1200 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.85:9 |
| PPI | 450 ppi | 427 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | 6000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 90.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 98.3% | - |
| PWM | 354 Hz | - |
| Response time | 7 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.26 mm (6.35 inches) | 161.9 mm (6.37 inches) |
| Width | 76.46 mm (3.01 inches) | 76.1 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) | 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 224 g (7.9 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Gray, Red | Black, Gold, Green, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.82/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 90 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.3 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~588.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 26944 | 3987 |
| Single-core score | 3422 | 1104 |
| Multi-core score | 10065 | 3159 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1098383 | 358049 |
| GPU | 1275843 | 160718 |
| Memory | 378116 | 210830 |
| UX | 756339 | 247707 |
| Total score | 3508681 | 977304 |
| Samples | [17 tests] | [21 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 52% | - |
| Graphics test | 22 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Graphics score | 3009 | 350 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 51 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 55 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 52 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 43 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 13319 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11183 | 10627 |
| Video editing | 5850 | 6303 |
| Photo editing | 22747 | 19133 |
| Data manipulation | 13395 | 7981 |
| Writing score | 19055 | 13750 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#39th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X9 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-26 -> FrostbyteX | AnTuTu | 3454088 |
| 📘 2026-07-14 (7kxlz) | AnTuTu | 3520797 |
| 📘 2026-05-23 (Valerij) | AnTuTu | 3562181 |
| 📘 2026-05-23 (Awie97#) | AnTuTu | 3515251 |
| 📘 2026-04-29 (Alijka) | AnTuTu | 3473300 |
Honor X9d
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-04 (BatheanThe_) | AnTuTu | 912468 |
| 📘 2026-08-29 (Kk) | AnTuTu | 866729 |
| 📘 2026-07-21 (Raf Hakobyan) | AnTuTu | 973945 |
| 📘 2026-07-21 (Raf Hakobyan) | CPU Throttle | 100% |
| 📘 2026-07-05 (Никитка) | AnTuTu | 995701 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | MagicOS 9.0 |
| OS size | 58 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | 2 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (54% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:20 hr | 1:21 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1300 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 19:04 hr | - |
| Watching video | 25:00 hr | - |
| Gaming | 10:24 hr | - |
| Standby | 107 hr | - |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#13th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 108 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 12000 x 9000 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Ultrawide: 5 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-828 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.67" (≈ 0.6 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | - |
| Focal length | 70 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.5 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | - |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 180 | - |
| Zoom | 131 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Pro from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 3456 x 4608 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | October 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1299 | $350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 66 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Find X9 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1