Oppo K13 Turbo vs Honor X9d
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.8-inch Oppo K13 Turbo (with MediaTek Dimensity 8450) that was released on July 21, 2025, against the Honor X9d, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo K13 Turbo
- 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1990K versus 977K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 66W)
- 46% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1612 and 1104 points
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor X9d
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Comes with 1300 mAh larger battery capacity: 8300 vs 7000 mAh
- Optical image stabilization
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 inches | 6.79 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels | 1200 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.85:9 |
| PPI | 453 ppi | 427 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 6000 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) | 161.9 mm (6.37 inches) |
| Width | 77.2 mm (3.04 inches) | 76.1 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) | 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 207 g (7.3 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Waterproof | IPX9 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Active fan | - |
| Rear material | - | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Black, Purple | Black, Gold, Green, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 3250 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.3 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 880 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 MP7 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU shading units | 896 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2329.6 GFLOPS | ~588.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 12321 | 3987 |
| Single-core score | 1612 | 1104 |
| Multi-core score | 6210 | 3159 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 624873 | 358049 |
| GPU | 647052 | 160718 |
| Memory | 256266 | 210830 |
| UX | 461908 | 247707 |
| Total score | 1990099 | 977304 |
| Samples | [15 tests] | [21 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1467 | 350 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 25 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 27 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 25 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 22 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 6549 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17107 | 10627 |
| Video editing | 6366 | 6303 |
| Photo editing | 31941 | 19133 |
| Data manipulation | 10037 | 7981 |
| Writing score | 19003 | 13750 |
Recent User Tests
Oppo K13 Turbo
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-19 -> AndroSid | GeekBench GPU | 12587 |
| π 2026-08-19 -> AndroSid | GeekBench CPU | 1612 / 6210 |
| π 2026-08-14 -> AndroSid | CPU Throttle | 90% |
| π 2026-08-14 -> AndroSid | AnTuTu | 2016976 |
| π 2026-06-30 (ALONE EMPEROR) | AnTuTu | 1925606 |
Honor X9d
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-04 (BatheanThe_) | AnTuTu | 912468 |
| π 2026-08-29 (Kk) | AnTuTu | 866729 |
| π 2026-07-21 (Raf Hakobyan) | AnTuTu | 973945 |
| π 2026-07-21 (Raf Hakobyan) | CPU Throttle | 100% |
| π 2026-07-05 (ΠΠΈΠΊΠΈΡΠΊΠ°) | AnTuTu | 995701 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | ColorOS 15 | MagicOS 9.0 |
| OS updates | - | 2 years |
| Security updates | - | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7000 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (63% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:56 hr | 1:21 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 108 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 12000 x 9000 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 120 FPS (1080p) | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Ultrawide: 5 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor size | - | 1/1.67" (β 0.6 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 5 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 24 mm |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4920 x 3264 | 3456 x 4608 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | July 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $305 | $350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 66 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Oppo K13 Turbo. But if the camera, battery life, software, and design are more of a priority β go for the Honor X9d.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 32