Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
94
out of 100
VS
78
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Oppo Find X9 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 16, 2025, against the Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9030S and came out 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Pro
- 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3508K versus 1622K)
- Shows 53% longer battery life (35:19 vs 23:04 hours)
- Comes with 1500 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 6000 mAh
- More energy-efficient CPU – Dimensity 9500
- 2.7x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3422 and 1269 points
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
- The rear camera has a 4x optical zoom
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
- The phone is 9 months newer
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels | 1308 x 2880 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | - |
| PPI | 450 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Kunlun Glass 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 90.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 98.3% | - |
| PWM | 354 Hz | - |
| Response time | 7 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.26 mm (6.35 inches) | 164 mm (6.46 inches) |
| Width | 76.46 mm (3.01 inches) | 77.1 mm (3.04 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.25 mm (0.32 inches) | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 224 g (7.9 oz) | 230.5 g (8.13 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Gray, Red | Black, Gold, Orange, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Good (3.82/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 90 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | HiSilicon Kirin 9030S |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 4 cores at 1.62 GHz: Taishan v124 Little - 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: Taishan v124 Mid - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Taishan v124 Big |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | SMIC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Maleoon 935F |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 933 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~1433.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 26944 | 4481 |
| Single-core score | 3422 | 1269 |
| Multi-core score | 10065 | 4424 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1098383 | 601782 |
| GPU | 1275843 | 300105 |
| Memory | 378116 | 374029 |
| UX | 756339 | 346833 |
| Total score | 3508681 | 1622749 |
| Samples | [17 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 52% | - |
| Graphics test | 22 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3009 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 51 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 55 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 52 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 43 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 13319 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11183 | - |
| Video editing | 5850 | - |
| Photo editing | 22747 | - |
| Data manipulation | 13395 | - |
| Writing score | 19055 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#39th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X9 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-26 -> FrostbyteX | AnTuTu | 3454088 |
| 📘 2026-07-14 (7kxlz) | AnTuTu | 3520797 |
| 📘 2026-05-23 (Valerij) | AnTuTu | 3562181 |
| 📘 2026-05-23 (Awie97#) | AnTuTu | 3515251 |
| 📘 2026-04-29 (Alijka) | AnTuTu | 3473300 |
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | EMUI 16 |
| OS size | 58 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
| Security updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (80 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (54% in 30 min) | Yes (60% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:20 hr | 1:02 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1300 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 19:04 hr | 09:34 hr |
| Watching video | 25:00 hr | 17:56 hr |
| Gaming | 10:24 hr | 05:39 hr |
| Standby | 107 hr | 88 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#13th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 4x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 40 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.4 - 4.0 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-828 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 89 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.5 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 40 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Omnivision OV40A |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/1.7" (≈ 0.59 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 180 | - |
| Zoom | 131 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Pro from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2025 | July 2026 |
| Release date | October 2025 | August 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1299 | $1149 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Find X9 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1