Vivo X300 Ultra vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
93
out of 100
VS
78
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X300 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9030S and came out 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Ultra
- 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4247K versus 1622K)
- Delivers 87% higher peak brightness (3334 against 1786 nits)
- Shows 27% longer battery life (29:11 vs 23:04 hours)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- 11% higher pixel density (510 vs 460 PPI)
- 3x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3784 and 1269 points
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
- The rear camera has a 4x optical zoom
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1308 x 2880 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | - |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-144 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Armor glass | Kunlun Glass 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 110 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.98 mm (6.42 inches) | 164 mm (6.46 inches) |
| Width | 76.81 mm (3.02 inches) | 77.1 mm (3.04 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 232 g (8.18 oz) | 230.5 g (8.13 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Green | Black, Gold, Orange, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Good (3/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 180 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | HiSilicon Kirin 9030S |
| Max clock | 4608 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 4 cores at 1.62 GHz: Taishan v124 Little - 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: Taishan v124 Mid - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Taishan v124 Big |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | SMIC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Maleoon 935F |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 933 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~1433.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27357 | 4481 |
| Single-core score | 3784 | 1269 |
| Multi-core score | 11394 | 4424 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1192014 | 601782 |
| GPU | 1543938 | 300105 |
| Memory | 525105 | 374029 |
| UX | 986376 | 346833 |
| Total score | 4247433 | 1622749 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#7th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X300 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-06 (Dipshit6769) | AnTuTu | 3835023 |
| 📘 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF) | GeekBench CPU | 3784 / 11394 |
| 📘 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF) | AnTuTu | 4175239 |
| 📘 2026-04-28 (Razor97FF) | AnTuTu | 4247433 |
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | EMUI 16 |
| OS size | 60 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
| Security updates | 7 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 6600 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (80 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (66% in 30 min) | Yes (60% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:46 hr | 1:02 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 10:18 hr | 09:34 hr |
| Watching video | 20:51 hr | 17:56 hr |
| Gaming | 06:43 hr | 05:39 hr |
| Standby | 137 hr | 88 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#59th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12256 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 4x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 116° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 40 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.4 - 4.0 |
| Focal length | 35 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-901 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12" (≈ 0.89 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 89 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP0 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 40 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Omnivision OV40A |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.7" (≈ 0.59 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 180 | - |
| Zoom | 172 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X300 Ultra from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March 2026 | July 2026 |
| Release date | April 2026 | August 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $1149 |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 1.29 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X300 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 24