Oppo Find X9s vs Find X9
90
out of 100
VS
89
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.59-inch Oppo Find X9s (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500s) that was released on April 21, 2026, against the Oppo Find X9, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9500 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9s
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.1)
- The phone is 6 months newer
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3400K versus 2884K)
- 26% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3107 and 2463 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 inches | 6.59 inches |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels | 1256 x 2760 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | 3600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.8% | 90.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 98.9% |
| PWM | - | 474 Hz |
| Response time | - | 20 ms |
| Contrast | - | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 156.98 mm (6.18 inches) | 156.98 mm (6.18 inches) |
| Width | 73.93 mm (2.91 inches) | 73.93 mm (2.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Orange, Purple | White, Black, Gray, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.71/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Average (D) Β· 45 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max clock | 3730 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP11 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 19397 | 28255 |
| Single-core score | 2463 | 3107 |
| Multi-core score | 7370 | 9557 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 849539 | 966933 |
| GPU | 1014986 | 1291009 |
| Memory | 392170 | 423697 |
| UX | 628247 | 718784 |
| Total score | 2884942 | 3400423 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [7 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 52% |
| Graphics test | - | 23 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 3119 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 48 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 55 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 48 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 41 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 12571 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 11502 |
| Video editing | - | 5863 |
| Photo editing | - | 23536 |
| Data manipulation | - | 12903 |
| Writing score | - | 19110 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (128th and 55th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X9s
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-07-30 (X9S) | AnTuTu 11 | 2884942 |
| π 2026-07-13 (B) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2463 / 7370 |
| π 2026-07-13 (B) | AnTuTu 11 | 2834467 |
Oppo Find X9
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-02 (weipoh09) | AnTuTu 12 | 3319530 |
| π 2026-08-01 (Azad Boyka) | AnTuTu 11 | 3406583 |
| π 2026-07-13 (Dazza29) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 24276 |
| π 2026-07-13 (Dazza29) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1953 / 3134 |
| π 2026-06-29 (No name) | AnTuTu 11 | 3272691 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | ColorOS 16 |
| OS size | - | 14 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7025 mAh | 7025 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:15 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1300 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | 120Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.65 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony LYT-808 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 65 mm | 73 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.5 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.1 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2026 | October 2025 |
| Release date | April 2026 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $910 | $899 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the battery life is more important to you, then choose the Oppo Find X9s. But if the performance, gaming, connectivity, and sound are more of a priority β go for the Oppo Find X9.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 100