Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Huawei Nova 15
76
out of 100
VS
66
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.8-inch Oppo K13 Turbo Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on July 21, 2025, against the Huawei Nova 15, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 8000 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- 2.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2341K versus 1033K)
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- 15% higher pixel density (453 vs 395 PPI)
- More energy-efficient CPU β Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
- 2.3x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2068 and 887 points
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Nova 15
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels | 1084 x 2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 453 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | - |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 88.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) | 161.87 mm (6.37 inches) |
| Width | 77.2 mm (3.04 inches) | 75.5 mm (2.97 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) | 7.2 mm (0.28 inches) |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Active fan | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | - | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Purple | White, Black, Green, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | HiSilicon Kirin 8000 |
| Max clock | 3210 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 1.3 GHz: - 3 cores at 2.05 GHz: - 1 core at 2.285 GHz: |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | SMIC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Adreno 825 | Mali-G610 MP4 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS | ~860.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 13041 | - |
| Single-core score | 2068 | 887 |
| Multi-core score | 6385 | 2610 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 711180 | 427262 |
| GPU | 825194 | 99555 |
| Memory | 301194 | 216046 |
| UX | 504132 | 290258 |
| Total score | 2341700 | 1033121 |
| Samples | [25 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 64% | - |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1790 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 32 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 35 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 32 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 27 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 8293 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 18096 | - |
| Video editing | 7532 | - |
| Photo editing | 26855 | - |
| Data manipulation | 14510 | - |
| Writing score | 21062 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#184th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-23 (raumatiensinh) | AnTuTu 12 | 2420250 |
| π 2026-08-27 (Dhdhd) | AnTuTu 11 | 2519399 |
| π 2026-08-21 (Dice Morgan) | AnTuTu 11 | 2348057 |
| π 2026-08-03 (EXILER) | AnTuTu 11 | 2319105 |
| π 2026-08-03 -> Tushar_dmrc | AnTuTu 11 | 2323613 |
Huawei Nova 15
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | - |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | HarmonyOS 6 |
| ROM | ColorOS 15 | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (63% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:56 hr | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 120 FPS (1080p) | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor size | - | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 12 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | - | 69 mm |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4920 x 3264 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.5" (β 0.4 inch) |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | July 2025 | December 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | December 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | $400 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1