Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs K13 Turbo
77
out of 100
VS
72
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.8-inch Oppo K13 Turbo Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on July 21, 2025, against the Oppo K13 Turbo, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8450. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Optical image stabilization
- 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2341K versus 1990K)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- 28% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2068 and 1612 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels | 1280 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 453 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | AGC DT-Star D+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) | 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) |
| Width | 77.2 mm (3.04 inches) | 77.2 mm (3.04 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IPX9 |
| Advanced cooling | Active fan | Active fan |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Purple | White, Black, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 |
| Max clock | 3210 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Adreno 825 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 896 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS | ~2329.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 13041 | 12321 |
| Single-core score | 2068 | 1612 |
| Multi-core score | 6385 | 6210 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 711180 | 624873 |
| GPU | 825194 | 647052 |
| Memory | 301194 | 256266 |
| UX | 504132 | 461908 |
| Total score | 2341700 | 1990099 |
| Samples | [25 tests] | [15 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 64% | - |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | 11 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1790 | 1467 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 32 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Section 1 | 35 FPS | 27 FPS |
| Section 2 | 32 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Section 3 | 27 FPS | 22 FPS |
| Graphics score | 8293 | 6549 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 18096 | 17107 |
| Video editing | 7532 | 6366 |
| Photo editing | 26855 | 31941 |
| Data manipulation | 14510 | 10037 |
| Writing score | 21062 | 19003 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#175th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-27 (Dhdhd) | AnTuTu | 2519399 |
| π 2026-08-21 (Dice Morgan) | AnTuTu | 2348057 |
| π 2026-08-03 (EXILER) | AnTuTu | 2319105 |
| π 2026-08-03 -> Tushar_dmrc | AnTuTu | 2323613 |
| π 2026-07-22 (Mr Rahman) | AnTuTu | 2376220 |
Oppo K13 Turbo
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-19 -> AndroSid | GeekBench GPU | 12587 |
| π 2026-08-19 -> AndroSid | GeekBench CPU | 1612 / 6210 |
| π 2026-08-14 -> AndroSid | CPU Throttle | 90% |
| π 2026-08-14 -> AndroSid | AnTuTu | 2016976 |
| π 2026-06-30 (ALONE EMPEROR) | AnTuTu | 1925606 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | ColorOS 15 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Capacity | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (63% in 30 min) | Yes (63% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:56 hr | 0:56 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 120 FPS (1080p) | 120 FPS (1080p) |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 27 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4920 x 3264 | 4920 x 3264 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | July 2025 | July 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | July 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | $305 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, connectivity, design, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 61